This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Galvin, E. M. Articles by van Bommel, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Galvin, E. M. Articles by van Bommel, J. Related Collections Monitoring (Non-cardiac) Regional Anesthesia

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Peripheral Flow Index Is a Reliable and Early Indicator of Regional Block Success

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Eilish Galvin, MB, FCARCSI, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Address e-mail to eilishgalvin{at}hotmail.com.

We investigated the usefulness of peripheral flow index (PFI) measurement using a standard pulse oximetry digit probe for early prediction of successful regional blocks. Sixty-six patients scheduled for limb surgery underwent either axillary or sciatic block using a nerve stimulator technique with mepivacaine 1.5%. PFI, which is the ratio of the pulsatile versus the nonpulsatile component of the pulse oximetry signal, was recorded from 10 min before block insertion until 30 min afterwards. PFI recordings of the unblocked limb were similarly recorded. Pinprick and cold sensation were assessed at 5-min intervals until 30 min after blockade. An increase in PFI by a factor of 1.55 at 10 min after axillary block placement (P = 0.006), and 12 min after sciatic block placement (P = 0.001) was required to predict a successful block. The sensitivity and specificity of PFI was 100% for predicting axillary block outcomes at this time. Positive predictive value was 95% and negative predictive value was 93%. For sciatic blocks, sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 100%, respectively. The calculated positive predictive value at time 12 min for sciatic blocks was 94% and negative predictive value was 92%. At 15 min after block placement, cold and pinprick sensations had the same calculated values for sensitivity and specificity at 71% and 100%, respectively, for axillary blocks. For sciatic blocks, cold sensation had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 100%, whereas pinprick had a sensitivity of just 20% with a specificity of 100%. We conclude that PFI provides a simple, early, and objective assessment of the success and failure of nerve blocks.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Minville, A. Gendre, J. Hirsch, S. Silva, B. Bourdet, C. Barbero, O. Fourcade, K. Samii, and H. Bouaziz The Efficacy of Skin Temperature for Block Assessment After Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 1034 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Galvin and S. Niehof Further Evidence that Temperature Measurement Is a Useful Indicator of Regional Anesthesia Outcomes Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 740 - 741. [Full Text] [PDF]