This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shelley, K. H. Articles by Silverman, D. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shelley, K. H. Articles by Silverman, D. G. Related Collections Critical Care Equipment Monitoring (Non-cardiac) Technology

---

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

What Is the Best Site for Measuring the Effect of Ventilation on the Pulse Oximeter Waveform?

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and Department of Anesthesia, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kirk Shelley MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208051, New Haven, CT 06520-8051. Address e-mail to kirk.shelley{at}yale.edu.

The cardiac pulse is the predominant feature of the pulse oximeter (plethysmographic) waveform. Less obvious is the effect of ventilation on the waveform. There have been efforts to measure the effect of ventilation on the waveform to determine respiratory rate, tidal volume, and blood volume. We measured the relative strength of the effect of ventilation on the reflective plethysmographic waveform at three different sites: the finger, ear, and forehead. The plethysmographic waveforms from 18 patients undergoing positive pressure ventilation during surgery and 10 patients spontaneously breathing during renal dialysis were collected. The respiratory signal was isolated from the waveform using spectral analysis. It was found that the respiratory signal in the pulse oximeter waveform was more than 10 times stronger in the region of the head when compared with the finger. This was true with both controlled positive pressure ventilation and spontaneous breathing. A significant correlation was demonstrated between the estimated blood loss from surgical procedures and the impact of ventilation on ear plethysmographic data (r_s = 0.624, P = 0.006).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Cannesson, O. Desebbe, P. Rosamel, B. Delannoy, J. Robin, O. Bastien, and J.-J. Lehot Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 200 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Perel Automated Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1031 - 1033. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Cannesson, B. Delannoy, A. Morand, P. Rosamel, Y. Attof, O. Bastien, and J.-J. Lehot Does the Pleth Variability Index Indicate the Respiratory-Induced Variation in the Plethysmogram and Arterial Pressure Waveforms? Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1189 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Shelley Photoplethysmography: Beyond the Calculation of Arterial Oxygen Saturation and Heart Rate Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6S_Suppl): S31 - S36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Michard Using Pulse Oximetry Waveform Analysis to Guide Fluid Therapy: Are We There Yet? Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1606 - 1607. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Shelley, D. H. Jablonka, A. A. Awad, R. G. Stout, H. Rezkanna, and D. G. Silverman Using Pulse Oximetry Waveform Analysis to Guide Fluid Therapy: Are We There Yet? Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1607 - 1609. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Natalini Variations in Photoplethysmographic Waveform During Mechanical Ventilation Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1599 - 1600. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Cannesson, O. Desebbe, J. J. Lehot, H. Solus-Biguenet, M. Fleyfel, B. Tavernier, E. Kipnis, J. Onimus, E. Robin, G. Lebuffe, et al. Fluid responsiveness using non-invasive predictors during major hepatic surgery Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2007; 98(2): 272 - 274. [Full Text] [PDF]