Anesth Analg 2006;103:430-434
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226133.85114.91
NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
Sigma 1 Receptor Agonists Act as Neuroprotective Drugs Through Inhibition of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase
Kamila Vagnerova, MD,
Patricia D. Hurn, PhD,
Anish Bhardwaj, MD, and
Jeffrey R. Kirsch, MD
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Peri-Operative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jeffrey R. Kirsch, MD, Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Peri-Operative Medicine, OHSU, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road UHS-2, 97239, Portland, OR 97239. Address e-mail to kirschje{at}ohsu.edu.
Postischemic administration of the sigma-1 agonists reduces ischemic brain injury; however, the mechanism is unclear. We hypothesized that the sigma-1 agonist (+)isoform of pentazocine (P(+)) reduces damage in part by ameliorating cell death mediated via inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and that the ()isoform (P()) lacks this effect. We compared treatment with P(+) with or without the iNOS inhibitor aminoguanidine (AG) and also the effects of P(+) in iNOS deficient (iNOSKO) mice. A possible mechanism of neuroprotection is inhibition of iNOS expression. Male C57/Bl6 mice were subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (90 min) and drugs were administered with reperfusion: 1) P(+) with AG (P+/AG), 2) P(+), 3) P(), 4) AG, or 5) placebo. iNOSKOs were treated with either P(+) or placebo. Infarction (triphenyltetrazolium chloride histology, 72 h) was reduced by P(+) treatment in striatum by 44% and in neocortex by 23% versus placebo (P < 0.05), a reduction comparable to AG effect. P() did not attenuate brain injury. There was no difference in P(+)/AG treatment compared with showed the same level of neuroprotection as P(+) alone. P(+) also did not provide further neuroprotection for iNOSKOs. We conclude that postischemic administration of P(+) reduces infarct volume in mice. Because AG provides no additional benefit to P(+) treatment and iNOSKOs do not benefit from P(+), we speculate that P(+) acts by suppressing cell death resulting from iNOS toxicity.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. T. Tchedre, R.-Q. Huang, A. Dibas, R. R. Krishnamoorthy, G. H. Dillon, and T. Yorio
Sigma-1 Receptor Regulation of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels Involves a Direct Interaction
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
November 1, 2008;
49(11):
4993 - 5002.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Smith, J. Duplantier, Y. Dun, B. Mysona, P. Roon, P. M. Martin, and V. Ganapathy
In Vivo Protection against Retinal Neurodegeneration by Sigma Receptor 1 Ligand (+)-Pentazocine
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
September 1, 2008;
49(9):
4154 - 4161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Dun, M. Thangaraju, P. Prasad, V. Ganapathy, and S. B. Smith
Prevention of Excitotoxicity in Primary Retinal Ganglion Cells by (+)-Pentazocine, a Sigma Receptor-1 Specific Ligand
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
October 1, 2007;
48(10):
4785 - 4794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|