JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hohlrieder, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hohlrieder, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Airway

Anesth Analg 2006;103:458-462
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000223679.14471.6c


GENERAL ARTICLES

Guided Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Is Superior to Conventional Tracheal Intubation by First-Month Anesthesia Residents After Brief Manikin-Only Training

Matthias Hohlrieder, MD*, Joseph Brimacombe, MB ChB, FRCA, MD{dagger}, Achim von Goedecke, MD*, and Christian Keller, MD, MSc*

From the *Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria; and {dagger}Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, James Cook University, Cairns Base Hospital, Cairns, Australia.

Address correspondence to Prof. J. Brimacombe, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, The Esplanade, Cairns 4870, Australia. Address e-mail tojbrimaco{at}bigpond.net.au.

In the following pilot study, we compared conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation (tracheal intubation) and laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion (guided ProSeal) for airway management by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Five first-month residents with no practical experience of airway management were observed performing these techniques in 200 ASA I–II anesthetized, paralyzed adults. Each resident managed 40 patients, 20 in each group, in random order. The number of insertion attempts, effective airway time, ventilatory capability during pressure-controlled ventilation set at 15 cm H2O, airway trauma, and skill acquisition were studied. Data were collected by unblinded observers. Insertion was more frequently successful (100% versus 65%) and effective airway time was shorter (41 ± 24 s versus 89 ± 62 s) in the guided ProSeal group (both P < 0.0001). Expired tidal volume was larger (730 ± 170 mL versus 560 ± 140 mL) and end-tidal CO2 lower (33 ± 4 mm Hg versus 37 ± 5 mm Hg) in the guided ProSeal group during pressure controlled ventilation (both P < 0.0001). Blood staining was more frequent on the laryngoscope (24% versus 2%; P < 0.0001) in the tracheal intubation group. There was evidence for skill acquisition in both groups. We conclude that laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for airway management in terms of insertion success, expired tidal volume, and airway trauma by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. The guided ProSeal technique has potential for cardiopulmonary resuscitation by novices when conventional intubation fails.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Timmermann, S. G. Russo, C. Eich, M. Roessler, U. Braun, W. H. Rosenblatt, and M. Quintel
The Out-of-Hospital Esophageal and Endobronchial Intubations Performed by Emergency Physicians
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 619 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.