JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Merrill, A. W. Articles by Carstens, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Merrill, A. W. Articles by Carstens, E. Related Collections Mechanisms Pain Pharmacology

---

PAIN MEDICINE

Propofol’s Effects on Nociceptive Behavior and Spinal C-Fos Expression After Intraplantar Formalin Injection in Mice with a Mutation in the Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid-Type_A Receptor ß3 Subunit

Austin W. Merrill, BS^*, Linda S. Barter, MVS, Uwe Rudolph, MD, Edmond I. Eger, II, MD, Joseph F. Antognini, MD^*, Mirela Iodi Carstens, BA^*, and E. Carstens, PhD^*

From the *Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, California; McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts; and the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Earl E. Carstens, Section of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616. E-mail: eecarstens{at}ucdavis.edu.

We investigated whether propofol affected nociceptive behavior and fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in the lumbo-sacral spinal cord after intraplantar formalin injection in wild-type (WT) mice and in mutant mice harboring a point mutation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type _A receptor, which renders them resistant to propofol. Bolus injection of propofol (30 mg/kg IV) in WT mice reduced phase 1 formalin-evoked behavior over the initial 2–3 min but did not alter phase 2 behavior or spinal FLI (64 ± 19 cells/section) compared with WT mice receiving intralipid vehicle plus intraplantar formalin (57 ± 19 cells/section). Most FLI was restricted to superficial dorsal horn laminae ipsilateral to the formalin injection. WT mice receiving a 60-min propofol infusion were anesthetized throughout and did not display nociceptive behavior but had FLI (58 ± 11 cells/section) that did not differ significantly from the other WT groups. Mutant mice receiving bolus injection of propofol (30 mg/kg) and intraplantar formalin were not anesthetized and exhibited nociceptive behavior. The total FLI in the spinal cord was 47 ± 29 cells/section. These data indicate that although propofol produces anesthesia, it does not prevent the FLI that is associated with nociception, a finding consistent with propofol lacking analgesic properties.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Akiyama, A. W. Merrill, K. Zanotto, M. I. Carstens, and E. Carstens Scratching Behavior and Fos Expression in Superficial Dorsal Horn Elicited by Protease-Activated Receptor Agonists and Other Itch Mediators in Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2009; 329(3): 945 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Akiyama, A. W. Merrill, M. I. Carstens, and E. Carstens Activation of Superficial Dorsal Horn Neurons in the Mouse by a PAR-2 Agonist and 5-HT: Potential Role in Itch J. Neurosci., May 20, 2009; 29(20): 6691 - 6699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fassoulaki, A. Melemeni, A. Paraskeva, I. Siafaka, and C. Sarantopoulos Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Requirements After Anesthesia with Sevoflurane, Desflurane or Propofol Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1715 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility? Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999