Anesth Analg 2006;103:1163-1169
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237394.21087.85
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
The Effects of Dexmedetomidine/Remifentanil and Midazolam/Remifentanil on Auditory-Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalogram at Light-to-Moderate Sedation Levels in Healthy Subjects
Matthias Haenggi, MD*,
Heidi Ypparila, PhD ,
Kathrin Hauser*,
Claudio Caviezel*,
Ilkka Korhonen, PhD ,
Jukka Takala, MD, PhD*, and
Stephan M. Jakob, MD, PhD*
From the *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; and VTT Information Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Stephan Jakob, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. Address e-mail to Stephan.Jakob{at}insel.ch.
Avoidance of excessively deep sedation levels is problematic in intensive care patients. Electrophysiologic monitoring may offer an approach to solving this problem. Since electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to different sedation regimens vary, we assessed electrophysiologic responses to two sedative drug regimens in 10 healthy volunteers. Dexmedetomidine/remifentanil (dex/remi group) and midazolam/remifentanil (mida/remi group) were infused 7 days apart. Each combination of medications was given at stepwise intervals to reach Ramsay scores (RS) 2, 3, and 4. Resting EEG, bispectral index (BIS), and the N100 amplitudes of long-latency auditory-evoked potentials (ERP) were recorded at each level of sedation. During dex/remi, resting EEG was characterized by a recurrent high-power low-frequency pattern which became more pronounced at deeper levels of sedation. BIS Index decreased uniformly in only the dex/remi group (from 94 ± 3 at baseline to 58 ± 14 at RS 4) compared to the mida/remi group (from 94 ± 2 to 76 ± 10; P = 0.029 between groups). The ERP amplitudes decreased from 5.3 ± 1.3 at baseline to 0.4 ± 1.1 at RS 4 (P = 0.003) in only the mida/remi group. We conclude that ERPs in volunteers sedated with dex/remi, in contrast to mida/remi, indicate a cortical response to acoustic stimuli, even when sedation reaches deeper levels. Consequently, ERP can monitor sedation with midazolam but not with dexmedetomidine. The reverse is true for BIS.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Haenggi, H. Ypparila-Wolters, S. Buerki, R. Schlauri, I. Korhonen, J. Takala, and S. M. Jakob
Auditory Event-Related Potentials, Bispectral Index, and Entropy for the Discrimination of Different Levels of Sedation in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2009;
109(3):
807 - 816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Bonhomme, P. Maquet, C. Phillips, A. Plenevaux, P. Hans, A. Luxen, M. Lamy, and S. Laureys
The Effect of Clonidine Infusion on Distribution of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Volunteers
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2008;
106(3):
899 - 909.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Oda, S. Toriyama, K. Tanaka, T. Matsuura, N. Hamaoka, M. Morino, and A. Asada
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Electrocorticography in Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Under Sevoflurane Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1272 - 1277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. M. Yuen, M. G. Irwin, T. W. Hui, M. K. Yuen, and L. H. Y. Lee
A Double-Blind, Crossover Assessment of the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2007;
105(2):
374 - 380.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|