This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mashour, G. A. Articles by Sandberg, W. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mashour, G. A. Articles by Sandberg, W. S. Related Collections Airway

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

Craniocervical Extension Improves the Specificity and Predictive Value of the Mallampati Airway Evaluation

George A. Mashour, MD, PhD^*, and Warren S. Sandberg, MD, PhD^*

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital; and Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to George A. Mashour, MD, PhD, 55 Fruit St., Clinics 309, Boston, MA 02114. Address e-mail to gmashour{at}partners.org.

BACKGROUND: The modified Mallampati (MMP) classification is a standard airway examination that assesses mouth opening and structures within the oral cavity. Recent data suggest that maximal mouth opening (as measured by interdental distance) is possible only with extension of the craniocervical junction. Because the MMP examination is performed with the head in a neutral position, the airway may appear worse because of submaximal interdental distance. We hypothesized that adding craniocervical extension to the MMP would allow for greater mouth opening, lower scores, and less false positives than the traditional MMP examination.

METHODS: Multiple clinicians with at least 1 yr of airway experience evaluated adult airways (n = 60) with the MMP examination (with head in neutral position). The same examination was then repeated with the addition of craniocervical extension (Extended Mallampati Score, EMS).

RESULTS: On average, craniocervical extension decreased the MMP class (P < 0.002). The EMS improved specificity from 70% to 80% and positive predictive value from 24% to 31% when compared with the traditional MMP. The sensitivity (83%) was the same for MMP and EMS.

CONCLUSIONS: Craniocervical extension improves the specificity and positive predictive value of the MMP airway evaluation while retaining sensitivity of the traditional MMP examination. The introduction of the EMS into clinical practice should be considered.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. M. Khawaja, J. T. Reed, S. Shaefi, H. V. Chitilian, and W. S. Sandberg Crisis Resource Management of the Airway in a Patient with Klippel-Feil Syndrome, Congenital Deafness, and Aortic Dissection Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2009; 108(4): 1220 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Mashour, S. Kheterpal, V. Vanaharam, A. Shanks, L. Y.-J. Wang, W. S. Sandberg, and K. K. Tremper The Extended Mallampati Score and a Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Are Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy in the Morbidly Obese Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1919 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Mallampati Scoring: Extend the Neck! Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, November 9, 2006; 2006(1109): 2 - 2. [Full Text]