JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalenka, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fiedler, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalenka, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fiedler, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care

Anesth Analg 2006;103:1522-1526
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000242533.59457.70


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Changes in the Serum Proteome of Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock

Armin Kalenka, MD*, Robert E. Feldmann, Jr, PhD{dagger}, Kevin Otero*, Martin H. Maurer, MD{dagger}, Klaus F. Waschke, MD*, and Fritz Fiedler, MD*

From the *Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; and {dagger}Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Armin Kalenka, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. Address e-mail to armin.kalenka{at}urz.uni-hd.de.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is still the leading cause of death in the intensive care unit. Our goal was to elucidate potential early differences in serum between survivors (SURV) and non-survivors (NON-SURV) on day 28.

METHODS: We applied proteomic technology to serum samples of patients with sepsis and septic shock. Serum samples from 18 patients with sepsis and septic shock were obtained during the first 12 h after diagnosis of septic shock. Patients were grouped into SURV and NON-SURV on day 28.

RESULTS: Seven patients survived and 11 patients died. Using proteome analysis, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis detected more than 200 spots per gel. A differential protein expression was discovered between SURV and NON-SURV, whereby protein alterations not yet described in sepsis were revealed.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that proteomic profiling is a useful approach for detecting protein expression dynamics in septic patients, and may bring us closer to achieving a comprehensive molecular profiling compared with genetic studies alone.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.