JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by March, X.
Right arrow Articles by Villalonga, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by March, X.
Right arrow Articles by Villalonga, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2006;103:1571-1573
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000242534.84131.c6


ANALGESIA

The Posterior Approach to the Sciatic Nerve in the Popliteal Fossa: A Comparison of Single- Versus Double-Injection Technique

Xavier March, MD*, Olga Pineda, MD*, Maria M. Garcia, PhD{dagger}, Dolores Caramés, MD*, and Antonio Villalonga, PhD*

From the *Servei d’Anestèsia, Reanimació i Terapèutica del Dolor and {dagger}Institut de Investigació Biomédica de Girona, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Xavier March, MD, Servei d’Anestèsia, Reanimació i Terapèutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Carretera de França s/n. Girona. Spain. Address e-mail: h416uxmm{at}htrueta.scs.es.

Abstract

We compared single-injection and double-injection of the sciatic nerve with nerve stimulation in the posterior popliteal approach using mepivacaine 1% in a prospective, randomized and single-blind study to evaluate effectiveness, delay of onset, and complications in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. In the single-injection group (Group S, n = 30), 25 mL of mepivacaine 1% was administered after eliciting foot inversion or plantar flexion. In the double-injection group (Group D, n = 30), 12.5 mL of the solution was injected after eversion or dorsiflexion and 12.5 mL after plantar flexion of the foot. Mean differences (sd) between the two groups from onset time to complete sensory block were not significant (21.9 [14.2] min vs 22.1 [13.8] min) except for the superficial peroneal nerve block (18 [13] min vs 11.4 [7.5] min, Group S and D, respectively; P < 0.05) and, in Group D, between the superficial peroneal and tibial nerve blocks (11.4 [7.5] min vs 22.3 [11.3] min, respectively; P < 0.05). Complete analgesia was achieved in 77% of Group S patients and in 87% of Group D (P = 0.22). Complete analgesia of the deep peroneal nerve was achieved in 80% and 97% in Group S and D, respectively; P < 0.05. There were more paresthesias during block procedure in Group D (17% vs 40%) (P < 0.05). We conclude that double-nerve stimulation of the sciatic nerve gives similar complete onset times and overall success rate to single-nerve stimulation and more paresthesias during block performance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. T. Muniz, J. Rodriguez, M. Bermudez, C. Valino, N. Blanco, M. Amor, P. Aguirre, A. Masid, J. Cortes, J. Alvarez, et al.
Low Volume and High Concentration of Local Anesthetic Is More Efficacious than High Volume and Low Concentration in Labat's Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 2085 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. Dufour, P. Quennesson, A. L. Van Robais, F. Ledon, P.-A. Laloe, N. Liu, and M. Fischler
Combined Ultrasound and Neurostimulation Guidance for Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison with Neurostimulation Alone
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1553 - 1558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Palmisani, P. Ronconi, R. A. De Blasi, and R. Arcioni
Lateral or Posterior Popliteal Approach for Sciatic Nerve Block: Difference is Related to the Anatomy
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 286 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Risch, S. Blumenthal, and A. Borgeat
Is the Double-Injection Technique Really Needed?
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 285 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
X. March, O. Pineda, D. Carames, A. Villalonga, and J. Trueta
Lateral or Posterior Popliteal Approach for Sciatic Nerve Block: Difference is Related to the Anatomy
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 286 - 287.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.