Anesth Analg 2007;104:65-70
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250224.02440.fe
CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA
The Accuracy of Electrocardiogram-Controlled Central Line Placement
Ralf E. Gebhard, MD*,
Peter Szmuk, MD ,
Evan G. Pivalizza, MBChB, FFASA ,
Vladimir Melnikov, MD ,
Christianne Vogt, MD , and
Robert D. Warters, MD
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School at Dallas and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas; and Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) guidance to confirm accurate positioning of central venous catheters (CVC), placed before surgery in the operating room, is rarely used in the United States. We designed this randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether the use of this technique impacts the accuracy of CVC placement.
METHODS: Patients in group ECG (n = 147) had a CVC placed using right-atrial ECG to guide catheter tip positioning. CVCs in group NO-ECG (n = 143) were positioned without this technique.
RESULTS: Overall, guidewire-ECG control resulted in more correctly positioned CVCs (96% vs 76%, P 0.001) without increasing placement time. Significantly more CVCs were placed in the middle of the superior vena cava in group ECG (P 0.001), although placement into the right atrium or right ventricle and into other vessels occurred significantly more often in group NO-ECG (P 0.001). Twenty patients in group NO-ECG required repositioning of their CVC after surgery, whereas this maneuver was necessary only in three patients in group ECG (P 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ECG guidance allows for more accurate CVC placement, and should be considered to increase patient safety and reduce costs associated with repositioning procedures.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Lee, J.-H. Bahk, H.-G. Ryu, C.-W. Jung, and Y. Jeon
Comparison of the bedside central venous catheter placement techniques: landmark vs electrocardiogram guidance
Br. J. Anaesth.,
May 1, 2009;
102(5):
662 - 666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wirsing, C. Schummer, R. Neumann, J. Steenbeck, P. Schmidt, and W. Schummer
Is Traditional Reading of the Bedside Chest Radiograph Appropriate To Detect Intraatrial Central Venous Catheter Position?
Chest,
September 1, 2008;
134(3):
527 - 533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. T. Schafer, J. Lindemann, P. Brendt, G. Kaiser, and J. Peters
Intracardiac Transvenous Echocardiography Is Superior to Both Precordial Doppler and Transesophageal Echocardiography Techniques for Detecting Venous Air Embolism and Catheter-Guided Air Aspiration
Anesth. Analg.,
January 1, 2008;
106(1):
45 - 54.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Saager, E. Wiesner, A. Rothhammer, and G. Pestel
Atrial Electrocardiogram for Verification of Correct Central Venous Catheter Placement
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1511 - 1511.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Gebhard
Atrial Electrocardiogram for Verification of Correct Central Venous Catheter Placement
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1511 - 1511.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Farooq
Can Electrocardiogram-Controlled Central Line Placement Decrease the Need for Routine Chest Radiographs After Central Venous Cannulation?
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2007;
104(6):
1614 - 1614.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Gebhard
Can Electrocardiogram-Controlled Central Line Placement Decrease the Need for Routine Chest Radiographs After Central Venous Cannulation?
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2007;
104(6):
1614 - 1615.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
ECG-Controlled Central Line Insertion
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine,
February 9, 2007;
2007(209):
4 - 4.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|