JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Lipfert, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Lipfert, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain Medicine
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pain

Anesth Analg 2007;104:442-447
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253513.15336.25


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Does Interscalene Catheter Placement with Stimulating Catheters Improve Postoperative Pain or Functional Outcome After Shoulder Surgery? A Prospective, Randomized and Double-Blinded Trial

Markus F. Stevens, MD, DEAA*, Robert Werdehausen*, Elisabeth Golla, MD*, Sebastian Braun, MD*, Henning Hermanns, MD*, Ansgar Ilg, MD{dagger}, Reinhardt Willers, PhD{ddagger}, and Peter Lipfert, MD, PhD*

From the Department of *Anesthesiology, {dagger}Orthopedics, and {ddagger}Informatics, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Address correspondence to Dr. M. F. Stevens, DEAA, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Postfach 101007, 40001 Düsseldorf, Germany. Address e-mail to markus.stevens{at}med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial we investigated the use of stimulating catheters in patients during and after shoulder surgery; functional improvement being the primary outcome measurement.

METHODS: After eliciting an adequate muscular twitch at ≤0.5 mA nerve stimulation output, the perineural catheter was advanced either blindly (conventional catheter = CC group, n = 20) or guided by stimulation via the catheter (stimulating catheter = SC group, n = 20). A bolus of 40 mL prilocaine 1% and 10 mL ropivacaine 0.75% was injected, followed by a patient-controlled infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (8 mL/h infusion rate, bolus 2 mL, lockout time 20 min).

RESULTS: Onset of motor block was faster in the SC group, whereas sensory block did not differ between groups. Median pain scores on two postoperative days were equal. Improvement of the objective shoulder function score (Constant Murley Score) 6 wk postoperatively was enhanced to a clinically relevant extent in the SC group compared to the CC group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the use of a stimulating catheter results in a faster onset of motor block, unaltered postoperative pain, and a significantly improved functional outcome 6 wk after shoulder surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
D. Q.H. Tran, L. Munoz, G. Russo, and R. J. Finlayson
Ultrasonography and stimulating perineural catheters for nerve blocks: a review of the evidence: [L'echographie et les catheters perineuraux stimulants pour les blocs nerveux : une synthese des donnees probantes]
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2008; 55(7): 447 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. J. Barrington, D. J. Olive, C. A. McCutcheon, C. Scarff, S. Said, R. Kluger, N. Gillett, and P. Choong
Stimulating Catheters for Continuous Femoral Nerve Blockade After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1316 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.