Anesth Analg 2007;104:555-562
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260135.46070.c3
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
A Randomized, Dose-Finding, Phase II Study of the Selective Relaxant Binding Drug, Sugammadex, Capable of Safely Reversing Profound Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block
Scott B. Groudine, MD*,
Roy Soto, MD ,
Cynthia Lien, MD ,
David Drover, MD , and
Kevin Roberts, MD*
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York; Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York; Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; and Department of Anesthesia, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Address correspondence to Scott B. Groudine, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical Center, A -131, 47 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208-34798. Address e-mail to groudis{at}mail.amc.edu.
BACKGROUND: The reversal of a deep neuromuscular blockade remains a significant clinical problem. Sugammadex, a modified -cyclodextrin, encapsulates steroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs, promoting their rapid dissociation from nicotinic receptors. Sugammadex is the first drug that acts as a selective relaxant binding agent.
METHODS: We enrolled 50 patients into a Phase II dose-finding study of the efficacy and safety of sugammadex. Subjects, anesthetized with nitrous oxide and propofol, were randomized to one of two doses of rocuronium (0.6 or 1.2 mg/kg) and to one of five doses of sugammadex (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, or 8.0 mg/kg). Neuromuscular monitoring was performed using the TOF Watch SX® acceleromyograph. Recovery was defined as a train-of-four ratio 0.9. Sugammadex was administered during profound block when neuromuscular monitoring demonstrated a posttetanic count of one or two.
RESULTS: Reversal of neuromuscular block was obtained after administration of sugammadex in all but the lowest dose groups (0.51.0 mg/kg) where several subjects could not be adequately reversed. At the 2 mg/kg dose all patients were reversed with sugammadex, but there was significant variability (1.815.2 min). Patient variability decreased and speed of recovery increased in a dose-dependent manner. At the highest dose (8 mg/kg), mean recovery time was 1.2 min (range 0.82.1 min). No serious adverse events were reported during this trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex was well tolerated and effective in rapidly reversing profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. The mean time to recovery decreased with increasing doses. Profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block can be reversed successfully with sugammadex at doses 2 mg/kg.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. F. White, B. Tufanogullari, O. Sacan, E. G. Pavlin, O. J. Viegas, H. S. Minkowitz, and M. E. Hudson
The Effect of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade on the Speed of Reversal with Sugammadex
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2009;
108(3):
846 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Flockton, P. Mastronardi, J. M. Hunter, C. Gomar, R. K. Mirakhur, L. Aguilera, F. G. Giunta, C. Meistelman, and M. E. Prins
Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine
Br. J. Anaesth.,
May 1, 2008;
100(5):
622 - 630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Cammu, P. J. De Kam, I. Demeyer, M. Decoopman, P. A. M. Peeters, J. M. W. Smeets, and L. Foubert
Safety and tolerability of single intravenous doses of sugammadex administered simultaneously with rocuronium or vecuronium in healthy volunteers
Br. J. Anaesth.,
March 1, 2008;
100(3):
373 - 379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Groudine
Sugammadex Rocuronium Dosing
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2007;
105(3):
884 - 884.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Kopman
Sugammadex Rocuronium Dosing
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2007;
105(3):
883 - 884.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
At Last: A Rapid Reversal Agent for Rocuronium
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine,
March 23, 2007;
2007(323):
2 - 2.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Miller
Sugammadex: An Opportunity to Change the Practice of Anesthesiology?
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2007;
104(3):
477 - 478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|