Anesth Analg 2007;104:575-581
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000244594.63318.fc
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
Sugammadex: Another Milestone in Clinical Neuromuscular Pharmacology
Mohamed Naguib, MB, BCh, MSc, FFARCSI, MD
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Unit 409, Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas M. D., Houston, Texas.
Sugammadex is a revolutionary investigational reversal drug currently undergoing Phase III testing whose introduction into clinical practice may change the face of clinical neuromuscular pharmacology. A modified -cyclodextrin, sugammadex exerts its effect by forming very tight water-soluble complexes at a 1:1 ratio with steroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs (rocuronium > vecuronium >> pancuronium). During rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, the IV administration of sugammadex creates a concentration gradient favoring the movement of rocuronium molecules from the neuromuscular junction back into the plasma, which results in a fast recovery of neuromuscular function. Sugammadex is biologically inactive, does not bind to plasma proteins, and appears to be safe and well tolerated. Additionally, it has no effect on acetylcholinesterase or any receptor system in the body. The compound's efficacy as an antagonist does not appear to rely on renal excretion of the cyclodextrin-relaxant complex. Human and animal studies have demonstrated that sugammadex can reverse very deep neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium without muscle weakness. Its future clinical use should decrease the incidence of postoperative muscle weakness, and thus contribute to increased patient safety. Sugammadex will also facilitate the use of rocuronium for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia by providing a faster onset-offset profile than that seen with 1.0 mg/kg succinylcholine. Furthermore, no additional anticholinesterase or anticholinergic drugs would be needed for antagonism of residual neuromuscular blockade, which would mean the end of the cardiovascular and other side effects of these compounds. The clinical use of sugammadex promises to eliminate many of the shortcomings in our current practice with regard to the antagonism of rocuronium and possibly other steroidal neuromuscular blockers.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Staals, M. M. J. Snoeck, J. J. Driessen, E. A. Flockton, M. Heeringa, and J. M. Hunter
Multicentre, parallel-group, comparative trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of sugammadex in patients with end-stage renal failure or normal renal function
Br. J. Anaesth.,
October 1, 2008;
101(4):
492 - 497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Eikermann, S. Zaremba, A. Malhotra, A. S. Jordan, C. Rosow, and N. L. Chamberlin
Neostigmine but not sugammadex impairs upper airway dilator muscle activity and breathing
Br. J. Anaesth.,
September 1, 2008;
101(3):
344 - 349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Craig and J. M. Hunter
Recent developments in the perioperative management of adult patients with chronic kidney disease
Br. J. Anaesth.,
September 1, 2008;
101(3):
296 - 310.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Bovill
Anesthetic Pharmacology: Reflections of a Section Editor
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1186 - 1190.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Hemmerling and G. Geldner
Sugammadex: Good Drugs Do Not Replace Good Clinical Practice
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1506 - 1506.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Naguib
Sugammadex May Replace Best Clinical Practice: A Misconception
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1506 - 1507.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. F. White, G. Hill, and A. Lenz
Where's the Fire?
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2007;
105(3):
878 - 878.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Miller
Sugammadex: An Opportunity to Change the Practice of Anesthesiology?
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2007;
104(3):
477 - 478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|