Anesth Analg 2007;104:582-584
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250617.79166.7f
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
A Temporary Decrease in Twitch Response During Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Muscle Relaxation with a Small Dose of Sugammadex
Douglas J. Eleveld, PhD,
Karel Kuizenga, MD, PhD,
Johannes H. Proost, PhD, and
J. Mark K. H. Wierda, MD, PhD
From Research Group for Experimental Anesthesiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Douglas Eleveld, Research Group for Experimental Anesthesiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Address e-mail to d.j.eleveld{at}anest.umcg.nl.
BACKGROUND: We present a case in which a temporary decrease in train-of-four (TOF) response was observed after reversal of muscle relaxation with a small dose (0.5 mg/kg) of sugammadex administered 42 min after 0.9 mg/kg of rocuronium. At the end of the operation, the TOF ratio was >0.9, and the patient woke normally, without signs of muscle weakness. We describe this temporary decrease in muscle response during muscle relaxation reversal as muscle relaxation rebound and hypothesize that it occurs when the dose of sugammadex is sufficient for complex formation with rocuronium in the central compartment, but insufficient for redistribution of rocuronium from peripheral to central compartments.
METHODS: To investigate our hypothesis, we developed and fit a simple pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic model of rocuronium, sugammadex, and their interaction to the patient TOF response data.
RESULTS: Simulations using the fitted model indicate that muscle relaxation rebound can occur for doses of sugammadex in a limited critical range.
CONCLUSIONS: Sufficiently large doses of sugammadex eliminate the possibility for muscle relaxation rebound, which does not require dissociation of the sugammadex/ rocuronium complex.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Srivastava and J. M. Hunter
Reversal of neuromuscular block
Br. J. Anaesth.,
July 1, 2009;
103(1):
115 - 129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. F. White, B. Tufanogullari, O. Sacan, E. G. Pavlin, O. J. Viegas, H. S. Minkowitz, and M. E. Hudson
The Effect of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade on the Speed of Reversal with Sugammadex
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2009;
108(3):
846 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Hemmerling and G. Geldner
Sugammadex: Good Drugs Do Not Replace Good Clinical Practice
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1506 - 1506.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Naguib
Sugammadex May Replace Best Clinical Practice: A Misconception
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2007;
105(5):
1506 - 1507.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Miller
Sugammadex: An Opportunity to Change the Practice of Anesthesiology?
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2007;
104(3):
477 - 478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|