| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Address correspondence to Sachin Kheterpal, MD, MBA, 1H247 University Hospital Box 0048, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48103. Address e-mail to sachinkh{at}med.umich.edu.
BACKGROUND: Medicolegal, clinical, and reimbursement needs warrant complete and accurate documentation. We sought to identify and improve our compliance rate for the documentation of arterial catheterization in the perioperative setting.
METHODS: We first reviewed 12 mo of electronic anesthesia records to establish a baseline compliance rate for arterial catheter documentation. Residents and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists were randomly assigned to a control group and experimental group. When surgical incision and anesthesia end were documented in the electronic record keeper, a reminder routine checked for an invasive arterial blood pressure tracing. If a case used an arterial catheter, but no procedure note was observed, the resident or Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist assigned to the case was sent an automated alphanumeric pager and e-mail reminder. Providers in the control group received no pager or e-mail message. After 2 mo, all staff received the reminders.
RESULTS: A baseline compliance rate of 80% was observed (1963 of 2459 catheters documented). During the 2-mo study period, providers in the control group documented 152 of 202 (75%) arterial catheters, and the experimental group documented 177 of 201 (88%) arterial lines (P < 0.001). After all staff began receiving reminders, 309 of 314 arterial lines were documented in a subsequent 2 mo period (98%). Extrapolating this compliance rate to 12 mo of expected arterial catheter placement would result in an annual incremental $40,500 of professional fee reimbursement.
CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of the tertiary care process results in documentation deficiencies. Inexpensive automated reminders can drastically improve compliance without the need for complicated negative or positive feedback.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H. Epstein, F. Dexter, and E. Piotrowski Automated Correction of Room Location Errors in Anesthesia Information Management Systems Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 965 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Vigoda, L. I. Rodriguez, E. Wu, K. Perry, R. Duncan, D. J. Birnbach, and D. A. Lubarsky The Use of an Anesthesia Information System to Identify and Trend Gender Disparities in Outpatient Medical Management of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 185 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Sandberg, E. H. Sandberg, A. R. Seim, S. Anupama, J. M. Ehrenfeld, S. F. Spring, and J. L. Walsh Real-Time Checking of Electronic Anesthesia Records for Documentation Errors and Automatically Text Messaging Clinicians Improves Quality of Documentation Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 192 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Dexter Detecting Diversion of Anesthetic Drugs by Providers Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 897 - 898. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|