This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lakhal, K. Articles by Laffon, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lakhal, K. Articles by Laffon, M.

---

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

The Feasibility of Ultrasound to Assess Subglottic Diameter

Karim Lakhal, MD^*, Xavier Delplace, MD^*, Jean-Philippe Cottier, MD, François Tranquart, MD, Xavier Sauvagnac, MD^*, Colette Mercier, MD^*, Jacques Fusciardi, MD^*, and Marc Laffon, MD^*

From the *Groupement d’Anesthésie Réanimation, Service de Neuroradiologie, and Groupement d’Imagerie Médicale, CHU Tours, Tours, France.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Karim Lakhal, Réanimation Médicale et Infectieuse., Hopital Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Ave Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. Address e-mail to lakhal_karim{at}yahoo.fr.

BACKGROUND: In healthy patients, the narrowest diameter of the subglottic upper airway is the width of the air-column at the level of the cricoid cartilage. This diameter governs the selection of the endotracheal tube size, as excessive tube diameter may damage the tracheal mucosa leading to postextubation stridor or subglottic stenosis. Unfortunately, selecting endotracheal tube size based on height, weight, or age does not reliably lead to the proper tube. The knowledge of airway diameter, especially using a bedside noninvasive tool, could therefore be helpful in anesthesia and intensive care.

METHODS: We studied 19 healthy volunteers (27 ± 3 yr, nine females) to compare the transverse diameter of the cricoid lumen assessed by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between the two techniques (r = 0.99, P < 0.05) confirmed by Bland–Altman analysis with a bias of 0.14 mm, a precision of 0.33 mm, and limits of agreement of –0.68 mm/0.96 mm.

CONCLUSION: In young healthy adults, ultrasonography appeared to be a reliable tool to assess the diameter of the subglottic upper airway.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Williamson, A. L. James, M. J. Phillips, D. D. Sampson, D. R. Hillman, and P. R. Eastwood Quantifying tracheobronchial tree dimensions: methods, limitations and emerging techniques Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2009; 34(1): 42 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Marciniak, P. Fayoux, A. Hebrard, R. Krivosic-Horber, T. Engelhardt, and B. Bissonnette Airway Management in Children: Ultrasonography Assessment of Tracheal Intubation in Real Time? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2009; 108(2): 461 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]