JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roscoe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Slinger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roscoe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Slinger, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care
Right arrow Airway
Right arrow Ventilation

Anesth Analg 2007;104:655-658
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000255171.94527.c7


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Pressures Exerted by Endobronchial Devices

Andrew Roscoe, FRCA, George W. Kanellakos, FRCPC, Karen McRae, FRCPC, and Peter Slinger, FRCPC

From the Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

BACKGROUND: High endotracheal cuff pressures have been shown to cause high mucosal pressures and a reduction in mucosal blood flow, with the risk of mucosal ischemia. We aimed to directly measure the pressure exerted by the bronchial cuffs of double-lumen tubes (DLT) and by the cuffs of three new designs of endobronchial blocker (EBB).

METHODS: Using a validated in vitro model and a previously described technique, we measured the static pressures exerted by the cuff of DLTs and EBBs with 1 mL increments in cuff volume until maximum inflation was achieved. The study was repeated under dynamic conditions of simulated positive pressure ventilation.

RESULTS: The pressures exerted by the cuffs of DLTs ranged from 16–155 mm Hg. Pressures exerted by the EBB cuffs ranged from 39–194 mm Hg. At intra-cuff volumes required to create a seal to 25 cm H2O positive pressure, the pressures exerted by the cuffs of all the devices were <30 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS: A transmitted pressure <30 mm Hg has been recommended to avoid mucosal injury. Our study shows that at clinically relevant cuff volumes, the pressures exerted by the cuffs do not exceed the recommended safe limit.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. B. Brodsky
Lung separation and the difficult airway
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2009; 103(suppl_1): i66 - i75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.