JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kumazawa, M. Articles by Dohi, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kumazawa, M. Articles by Dohi, S. Related Collections Neuroanesthesia Physiology Pharmacology

---

NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

The Comparative Effects of Intravenous Nicardipine and Prostaglandin E1 on the Cerebral Pial Arteriolar Constriction Seen After Unclamping of an Aortic Cross-Clamp in Rabbits

Masahiko Kumazawa, MD^*, Hiroki Iida, MD^*, Masayoshi Uchida, MD, Mami Iida, MD, Motoyasu Takenaka, MD^*, and Shuji Dohi, MD^*

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Cardiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, Gifu; Department of Anesthesia, Chubu Rosai Hospital, Nagoya; and Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Faculty of Home Economics, Gifu Women's University, Gifu, Japan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Hiroki Iida, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. Address e-mail to iida{at}gifu-u.ac.jp.

BACKGROUND: The potent vasodilators nicardipine and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) are useful for the treatment of systemic hypertension or pulmonary hypertension during aortic surgery.

METHODS: We measured cerebral pial arteriolar diameters, using a rabbit closed cranial window preparation: before (baseline) and 15 min after the start of an IV infusion (preclamp) (0.9% saline [control group], nicardipine [at 0.1, 1.0, or 10 µg·kg^–1·min^–1], or PGE1 [at 0.1 or 1.0 µg·kg^–1·min^–1]), just after aortic clamping, 20 min after clamping, and at 0–60 min after unclamping.

RESULTS: In the control group, a significant decrease in diameter persisted for at least 60 min after unclamping (maximum [at 60 min], –16% for large [75 µm], and –27% for small [<75 µm] arterioles versus baseline). Although the aortic unclamping-induced vasoconstriction was unaffected under the smallest dose of nicardipine, it was significantly attenuated under larger doses in both large and small arterioles (residual vasoconstriction, –10% and –6% for large and –18% and –10% for small arterioles; at 60 min). The pial arteriolar constriction observed at 5 min or more after unclamping in the control group was not altered by PGE1 in either large or small arterioles.

CONCLUSIONS: The larger doses of nicardipine, but neither dose of PGE1, attenuated aortic unclamping-induced sustained cerebral pial arteriolar constriction.

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999