JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Story, D. A. Articles by Bellomo, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Story, D. A. Articles by Bellomo, R. Related Collections Physiology Critical Care

---

CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

The Effect of Albumin Concentration on Plasma Sodium and Chloride Measurements in Critically Ill Patients

David A. Story, MD, FANZCA^*, Hiroshi Morimatsu, MD^*, Moritoki Egi, MD^*, and Rinaldo Bellomo, MD, FJFICM^*

From the *Departments of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Health.

Address correspondence to David A. Story, Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Studley Rd., Heidelberg, Vic., 3084, Australia. Address e-mail to david.story{at}austin.org.au.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the difference between indirect and direct sodium assays would be related to the plasma albumin concentration. Further, we proposed that differences between indirect and direct chloride assays might be explained by interference from other plasma constituents, particularly bicarbonate, and possibly albumin.

METHODS: We studied 300 critically ill patients at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and compared each patient’s plasma sodium and chloride measurements from a central laboratory assay (indirect electrode) and an ICU blood gas machine assay (direct electrode).

RESULTS: The central laboratory sodium measurement was, on average, 2.1 mmol/L more than the ICU assay, limits of agreement 1.8–2.4 mmol/L greater, P < 0.001. The central laboratory chloride measurement was, on average, 1 mmol/L less than the ICU assay (limits of agreement 1.3–0.7 mmol/L less, P < 0.001). All correlations between the assay differences and plasma constituents were weak except for a moderately strong correlation between differences in sodium measurements and albumin. The difference in plasma sodium concentration between the assays (central laboratory – ICU) increased as the plasma concentration albumin decreased (difference = 6.2–0.16 albumin (g/L); P < 0.001, r = –0.46, r² = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS: The central laboratory and ICUs assays are analytically, statistically, and clinically different for both sodium and chloride. Unless taken into account, the differences could be large enough in hypoalbuminemic populations (such as critically ill patients) to affect clinical diagnosis and decision making.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B J Jones and P J Twomey Relationship of the absolute difference between direct and indirect ion selective electrode measurement of serum sodium and the total protein concentration J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 645 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999