JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unzueta, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Moral, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unzueta, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Moral, M. V.

Anesth Analg 2007;104:1029-1033
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260313.63893.2f


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Pressure-Controlled Versus Volume-Controlled Ventilation During One-Lung Ventilation for Thoracic Surgery

M. Carmen Unzueta, MD, PhD, J. Ignacio Casas, MD, and M. Victoria Moral, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

Address correspondence to M. Carmen Unzueta, Sant Antonio Ma Claret 167, Barcelona 08025, Spain. Address e-mail to mcunzueta{at}telefonica.net.

BACKGROUND: Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) has been suggested as a tool to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for patients undergoing thoracic surgery. In this study we investigated whether PCV results in improved arterial oxygenation compared with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) during OLV.

METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with good preoperative pulmonary function scheduled for thoracic surgery were prospectively randomized into two groups. Those in group A underwent OLV initially with VCV for 30 min followed by PCV for a similar period of time. Those in group B underwent OLV initially with PCV for 30 min followed by VCV for a similar duration. Airway pressures and arterial blood gases were obtained during OLV at the end of each ventilatory mode.

RESULTS: There were no differences during OLV in arterial oxygenation between VCV (Pao2, 206.1 ± 62.4 mm Hg) and PCV (Pao2, 202.1 ± 56.4 mm Hg; P = 0.534). Peak airway pressure was lower with PCV than with VCV (24.43 ± 3.42 cm H2O vs. 34.16 ± 5.21 cm H2O; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: The use of PCV during OLV does not lead to improved oxygenation during OLV compared with VCV for patients with good preoperative pulmonary function, but PCV did lead to lower peak airway pressures. Further study is needed for patients with severe obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
F. T. Lytle and D. R. Brown
Appropriate Ventilatory Settings for Thoracic Surgery: Intraoperative and Postoperative
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2008; 12(2): 97 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. Cadi, T. Guenoun, D. Journois, J.-M. Chevallier, J.-L. Diehl, and D. Safran
Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 709 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.