JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Suttner, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Suttner, S. W.

Anesth Analg 2007;104:1145-1149
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260566.39244.bd


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Bispectral Index-Guided General Anesthesia in Combination with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Reduces Recovery Time in Fast-Track Colon Surgery

Jochen Mayer, MD*, Joachim Boldt, MD, PhD*, Alexander Schellhaaß, MD*, Björn Hiller, MD{dagger}, and Stefan W. Suttner, MD*

From the *Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Germany and {dagger}Department of General Surgery, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Jochen Mayer, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany. Address e-mail to j-mayer{at}gmx.de.

BACKGROUND: The impact of bispectral index (BIS)-guided general anesthesia on recovery from general anesthesia has been evaluated in different patient populations. The benefit of using BIS has been inconsistent. We designed this study to examine the value of BIS-guided anesthesia in a fast-track setting where the goal is rapid recovery.

METHODS: Forty-four patients undergoing open colon resection were randomly assigned to receive either BIS-guided (BIS group, n = 22) or clinically guided (standard care group, n = 22) total IV anesthesia with propofol after placing a thoracic epidural catheter. Duration of postanesthesia care unit stay, time to tracheal extubation, direct drug cost, the incidence of hemodynamic abnormalities, ability of ambulation on the day of surgery, and patient satisfaction with anesthetic management were assessed.

RESULTS: In the BIS-guided group, tracheal extubation was achieved significantly earlier (7.6 vs. 15.4 min, P < 0.01) and the postanesthesia care unit stay was significantly shorter (51 vs. 85 min, P < 0.01). Total anesthetic drug cost was reduced by 23% and the incidence of hypotension requiring treatment was significantly lower in the BIS group. Early ambulation, patient satisfaction, and incidence of adverse events were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: BIS-guided IV anesthesia in combination with thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates rapid recovery and reduces the overall cost of care in patients undergoing fast-track colon surgery.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.