This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Domingo-Triadó, V. Articles by Moro, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Domingo-Triadó, V. Articles by Moro, B.

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Ultrasound Guidance for Lateral Midfemoral Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study

Vicente Domingo-Triadó, MD, DEAA^*, Salvador Selfa, MD, Francisco Martínez, Dolores Sánchez-Contreras, MD^*, Montserrat Reche, MD^*, Jose Tecles, MD, PhD, María T. Crespo, MD^*, Jose M. Palanca, MD, PhD^¶, and Blanca Moro, MD^*

From the *Departments of Anesthesiology, Radiology, and Traumatology, Lluís Alcanyis Hospital, Xàtiva, Spain; and the Departments of ¶Anesthesiology, and Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Valencia, Spain.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Vicente Domingo-Triadó, MD, DEAA, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Lluís Alcanyís, Ctra. Xàtiva-Silla Km 2, 46800 Xàtiva, (Valencia), Spain. Address e-mail to vdt5677{at}mail.ono.es.

Block of the sciatic nerve at the midfemoral level is usually performed using nerve stimulation techniques. We investigated the efficacy of ultrasound, combined with nerve stimulation, to locate and block the sciatic nerve at the lateral midfemoral level compared to nerve stimulation alone. Sixty-one patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. Thirty patients underwent a lateral block of the sciatic nerve at the midfemoral level guided by ultrasound (group US) and 31 patients received the block without ultrasound (group ES). Once an adequate motor response was obtained using nerve stimulation, 35 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% was administered. The main end-points of the study were: number of attempts to obtain an adequate motor response, success rate of nerve location at the first attempt, quality and duration of both sensory and motor blocks, and anesthetic distribution. The success of sciatic nerve location at the first attempt was significantly more frequent in the US group than in the ES group (76.6% versus 41.9%; P < 0.001). The quality of the sensory block and the tolerance to the pneumatic tourniquet were also significantly better in the US group (P < 0.01). We conclude that ultrasound combined with nerve stimulation improved the quality of the sensory block and the tolerance to the pneumatic tourniquet, reducing the number of attempts to perform sciatic nerve block at the midfemoral level.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Abrahams, M. F. Aziz, R. F. Fu, and J.-L. Horn Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2009; 102(3): 408 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Khabiri, F. Arbona, and J. Norton "Gapped Supine" Position for Ultrasound Guided Lateral Popliteal Fossa Block of the Sciatic Nerve Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1519 - 1519. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. T. Horlocker and D. J. Wedel Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: In Search of the Holy Grail Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1009 - 1011. [Full Text] [PDF]