This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dingemans, E. Articles by Girard, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dingemans, E. Articles by Girard, F.

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Neurostimulation in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Emmanuel Dingemans, MD^*, Stephan R. Williams, MD, PhD^*, Geneviève Arcand, MD, FRCPC^*, Philippe Chouinard, MD, FRCPC^*, Patrick Harris, MD, FRCSC, Monique Ruel, RN^*, and François Girard, MD, FRCPC^*

From the Department of *Anesthesiology and Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Stephan Williams, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke East, Montreal, Canada, H2L 4M1. Address e-mail to stephan.williams{at}umontreal.ca.

Ultrasound guidance (USG) for infraclavicular blocks provides real time visualization of the advancing needle and local anesthetic distribution. Whether visualization of local anesthetic spread can supplant neurostimulation as the end point for local anesthetic injection during USG block has never been formally evaluated. Therefore, for this prospective randomized study, we recruited 72 patients scheduled for hand or forearm surgery and compared the speed of execution and quality of USG infraclavicular block with either USG alone (Group U) or USG combined with neurostimulation (Group S). In Group U, local anesthetic was deposited in a U-shaped distribution posterior and to each side of the axillary artery using as few injections as possible (1, 2, and 3 injections in 29, 6, and 3 patients, respectively). In Group S, a single injection was made after obtaining a distal motor response with a stimulating current between 0.3 and 0.6 mA. The anesthetic solution consisted of 0.5 mL/kg of lidocaine 1.5%, bupivacaine 0.125%, and epinephrine 1:200 000 (final concentrations). Procedure times were significantly shorter in Group U compared with Group S (3.1 ± 1.6 min and 5.2 ± 4.7 min, respectively; P = 0.006). In Group S, anesthetic spread was mainly anterior to the axillary artery in 37% of patients and mainly posterior in 63% of patients. Thirty minutes after the injection, 86% of patients in Group U had complete sensory block in the musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerve territories compared with 57% in Group S (P = 0.007). Patients blocked in Group U with a single injection had the same rate of complete block (86%) as those blocked with more than one injection (86%). Block supplementation rates were 8% in Group U versus 26% in Group S (P = 0.049). Block failure occurred in one patient in Group S because of an inability to obtain a distal stimulation after 20 min. We conclude that USG infraclavicular block is more rapidly performed and yields a higher success rate when visualization of local anesthetic spread is used as the end point for injection. Posterolateral spread of local anesthetic around the axillary artery predicts successful block, circumventing the need for direct nerve visualization.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. R. Mariano, V. J. Loland, N. S. Sandhu, R. H. Bellars, M. L. Bishop, R. Afra, S. T. Ball, R. S. Meyer, R. C. Maldonado, and B. M. Ilfeld Ultrasound Guidance Versus Electrical Stimulation for Femoral Perineural Catheter Insertion J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2009; 28(11): 1453 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Macfarlane and K. Anderson Infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks CEACCP, October 1, 2009; 9(5): 139 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. R. Mariano, V. J. Loland, R. H. Bellars, N. S. Sandhu, M. L. Bishop, R. A. Abrams, M. J. Meunier, R. C. Maldonado, E. J. Ferguson, and B. M. Ilfeld Ultrasound Guidance Versus Electrical Stimulation for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Perineural Catheter Insertion J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2009; 28(9): 1211 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-C. Desgagnes, S. Levesque, N. Dion, M.-J. Nadeau, D. Cote, J. Brassard, P. C. Nicole, and A. F. Turgeon A Comparison of a Single or Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 668 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Mutty, E. J. Jensen, M. A. Manka Jr., M. J. Anders, and L. B. Bone Femoral Nerve Block for Diaphyseal and Distal Femoral Fractures in the Emergency Department. Surgical Technique J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_2_Part_2): 218 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. T. Horlocker and D. J. Wedel Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: In Search of the Holy Grail Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1009 - 1011. [Full Text] [PDF]