JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiegel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reske, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wiegel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reske, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2007;104:1578-1582
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000261260.69083.f3


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Complications and Adverse Effects Associated with Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Orthopedic Patients

Martin Wiegel, MD, Udo Gottschaldt, MD, Ria Hennebach, MD, Thilo Hirschberg, MD, and Andreas Reske, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Martin Wiegel, Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Anaesthesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. Address e-mail to martin.wiegel{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

BACKGROUND: The increasing popularity of continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNBs) warrants further study of their adverse effects and complications.

METHODS: Anterior sciatic, femoral, and interscalene brachial plexus CPNBs were performed preoperatively using standardized catheter techniques in orthopedic patients prior to general or spinal anesthesia. Complications and adverse effects related to CPNBs were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS: We analyzed 1398 CPNBs in 849 consecutive patients (mean age 65 ± 13 yr) between 2002 and 2004. Two-hundred-twenty-one patients received interscalene, 628 patients femoral, and 549 sciatic CPNBs, respectively. In all the latter patients, we performed both femoral and sciatic CPNBs. Overall, there were 9 cases of local inflammation at the insertion site (0.6%), and 3 local infections (pustule) (0.2%, all femoral CPNBs). In one patient undergoing a femoral technique, a retroperitoneal hematoma led to compression injury of the femoral nerve. Complete denervation of the quadriceps femoris muscle was confirmed by electroneuromyography. No other major neurological complications were noted. There was one case of methemoglobinemia associated with an interscalene CPNB. Vascular puncture occurred in approximately 6% of patients undergoing femoral and sciatic CPNBs. Catheter rupture was noted in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results add to the evidence that major complications from CPNBs are rare. However, minor adverse effects associated with CPNBs may be more common.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.