JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, B.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, B.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, E. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Drug Delivery
Right arrow Pain Medicine
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2007;105:176-183
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265533.13477.26


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

Single-Dose, Extended-Release Epidural Morphine (DepoDurTM) Compared to Conventional Epidural Morphine for Post-Cesarean Pain

Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, FRCA, Laura M. Roland, MD, Larry F. Chu, MD, MS, Vincent A. Campitelli, III, MD, and Edward T. Riley, MD

From the Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, FRCA, Department of Anesthesia, H3580, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305. Address e-mail to bcarvalho{at}stanford.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A single-dose of neuraxial morphine sulfate provides good post-Cesarean analgesia; however, its efficacy is limited to the first postoperative day. In a recent phase III study, extended-release epidural morphine (EREM) formulation provided more effective, prolonged analgesia after Cesarean delivery, compared to conventional epidural morphine. However, the study protocol did not allow for the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, used various postoperative analgesics, and monitoring and treatment of respiratory depression were not standardized. Our aims in this study were to compare postoperative analgesic consumption, pain scores and side effects of EREM with conventional morphine for the management of post-Cesarean pain in a setting more reflective of current obstetric practice.

METHODS: Seventy healthy parturients undergoing elective Cesarean delivery were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. Using a combined spinal epidural technique, patients received an intrathecal injection of bupivacaine 12 mg and fentanyl 10 mcg. After closure of the fascia, a single-dose of either conventional morphine 4 mg or EREM 10 mg was administered epidurally. Postoperatively, all patients received ibuprofen 600 mg orally every 6 h. Oral oxycodone and IV morphine were available for breakthrough pain. All patients received pulse oximetry and respiratory monitoring for 48 h post-Cesarean delivery.

RESULTS: Single-dose EREM significantly improved pain scores at rest and during activity. The median (interquartile range) of supplemental opioid medication usage for 48 h post-Cesarean (in milligram-morphine equivalents) decreased from 17 (22) to 10 (17) mg with EREM compared to conventional epidural morphine (P = 0.037). Both drugs were well tolerated with no significant difference in adverse event profiles.

CONCLUSION: EREM provides superior and prolonged post-Cesarean analgesia compared to conventional epidural morphine with no significant increases in adverse events.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Macarthur, C. Imarengiaye, L. Tureanu, and K. Downey
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Epidural Morphine Analgesia After Vaginal Delivery
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2010; 110(1): 159 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. J. N. Mhuircheartaigh, R. A. Moore, and H. J. McQuay
Analysis of individual patient data from clinical trials: epidural morphine for postoperative pain
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2009; 103(6): 874 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. R. Viscusi, D. R. Gambling, T. L. Hughes, and G. Z. Manvelian
Pharmacokinetics of extended-release epidural morphine sulfate: Pooled analysis of six clinical studies
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2009; 66(11): 1020 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Carvalho
Respiratory Depression After Neuraxial Opioids in the Obstetric Setting
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 956 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Roboubi
Extended Release Epidural Morphine, Far from Ideal for Postcesarean Delivery Pain Control
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6): 1864 - 1864.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Carvalho and E. Riley
Extended Release Epidural Morphine, Far from Ideal for Postcesarean Delivery Pain Control
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6): 1864 - 1865.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.