This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hagon, B. S. Articles by Van der Linden, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hagon, B. S. Articles by Van der Linden, P. J. Related Collections Anesthetic Techniques Regional Anesthesia

---

ANALGESIA

Parasacral Sciatic Nerve Block: Does the Elicited Motor Response Predict the Success Rate?

From the Department of Anesthesiology CHU-Brugmann—Huderf, Brussels, Belgium.

Address correspondence to Hagon Bénédicte, Department of Anesthesiology, CHU-Brugmann, Place A. Van Gehuchten, 4, b-1020 Brussels. Address e-mail to benedicte.hagon{at}chu-brugmann.be.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the tibial and the peroneal evoked motor response with regard to efficacy of sciatic nerve block using the parasacral approach.

METHODS: Twenty-six ASA I–III patients scheduled for elective lower limb surgery were randomized to receive a parasacral sciatic block, using a nerve stimulator technique seeking either a tibial (n = 14) or peroneal (n = 12) motor response. After the evoked motor response was obtained, a solution of 10 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (actual final concentration of epinephrine, 1/160,000) was slowly injected through the needle. Sensory and motor blocks were assessed every 5 min for 30 min by an anesthesiologist blinded to the elicited motor response. If the block was not complete 30 min after injection of the local anesthetics, it was considered as failed, and general anesthesia was supplemented.

RESULTS: Time to perform the block and level of minimal and maximal stimulation were not different between groups. The success rate of complete block was significantly higher in the tibial compared to the peroneal group (11 of 14 vs 2 of 12; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting a tibial motor response predicts a higher success rate than eliciting a peroneal motor response with parasacral sciatic nerve block.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. T. Muniz, J. Rodriguez, M. Bermudez, C. Valino, N. Blanco, M. Amor, P. Aguirre, A. Masid, J. Cortes, J. Alvarez, et al. Low Volume and High Concentration of Local Anesthetic Is More Efficacious than High Volume and Low Concentration in Labat's Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 2085 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]