JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, H.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, Y.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, H.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, Y.-S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain Medicine
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2007;105:267-271
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000266440.62424.f1


ANALGESIA

The Effects of Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block on Postoperative Pain Relief After Tonsillectomy: The Importance of the Extent of Obtunded Gag Reflex as a Clinical Indicator

Hee-Pyoung Park, MD*, Jung-won Hwang, MD*, Sang-Hyun Park, MD*, Young-Tae Jeon, MD*, Jae-Hyon Bahk, MD{dagger}, and Yong-Seok Oh, MD*

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Address correspondence to Jung-won Hwang, MD, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Korea 463-707. Address e-mail to jungwon{at}snubh.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of glossopharyngeal nerve block (GNB) for the control of posttonsillectomy pain in adult patients, and correlated the extent of obtunded gag reflex as a clinical indicator of GNB with the extent of pain relief.

METHODS: Seventy-five patients undergoing tonsillectomy received bilateral GNB with 0.75% ropivacaine with epinephrine (Group R), 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine (Group B) at the end of the operation, or no intervention (Group C). To evaluate the effects of GNB, we assessed throat pain (100 mm visual analog scale) and severity of gag reflex response 0.5, 8, and 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS: In the immediate postoperative period, pain scores at rest and when swallowing in Groups R and B were significantly lower than those in Group C (21 ± 17 and 23 ± 13 vs 42 ± 16, 28 ± 22 and 32 ± 19 vs 62 ± 14, P < 0.001). The analgesic effect of GNB was strongly correlated with the extent of obtunded gag reflex (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: GNB is a useful method for the palliation of posttonsillectomy pain. An obtunded gag reflex response may be a clinical indicator for analgesia from GNB.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.