This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tait, A. R. Articles by Malviya, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tait, A. R. Articles by Malviya, S.

---

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

Presenting Research Information to Children: A Tale of Two Methods

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Alan R. Tait, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of MI Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Address e-mail to atait{at}umich.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research information for children is often presented in a manner that is difficult to understand. We designed this study, therefore, to examine the effect of improved readability and processability of written study information on childrens' understanding.

METHODS: One-hundred-ninety children aged 7–17 yr who were hospitalized for a surgical procedure or medical treatment were randomized to receive study information using either a standard form or a modified form with improved readability and processability. Children were interviewed to determine their understanding of eight study elements, including the risks, benefits, protocol, etc., and their responses scored by two independent assessors.

RESULTS: Children who were randomized to the modified form had significantly greater overall understanding of the information and greater understanding of the protocol and benefits (P < 0.05). The modified form was particularly effective in improving younger children's (7–10 yr) understanding of the material. Multivariate analysis identified several predictors of understanding, including the modified format, age, reading ability and the degree to which the child read the information. When shown both forms, 81.3% of children preferred the modified form stating that it was "friendlier" and "easier to read." The use of a larger font size and pictures were particularly popular.

CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that modification of study information to better fit the ages and meet the reading and cognitive abilities of children results in their improved understanding and acceptance of the material.