JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tejman-Yarden, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gurman, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tejman-Yarden, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gurman, G. M.

Anesth Analg 2007;105:397-404
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281943.81023.6e


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Acoustic Monitoring of Lung Sounds for the Detection of One-Lung Intubation

S. Tejman-Yarden, MD*, A. Zlotnik, MD{dagger}, L. Weizman, MSc{ddagger}, J. Tabrikian, PhD{ddagger}, A. Cohen, PhD{ddagger}, N. Weksler, MD{dagger}, and G. M. Gurman, MD{dagger}

From the Divisions of *Pediatrics; {dagger}Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Soroka Medical Center; and {ddagger}Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shai Tejman-Yarden, MD, Division of Pediatrics, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84101, Israel. Address e-mail to teyman{at}bgumail.bgu.ac.il.

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring methods for the early diagnosis of one-lung intubation (OLI) are nonspecific and controversial. In this study, we evaluated a new acoustic monitoring system for the detection of OLI.

METHODS: Lung sounds were collected from 24 adult surgical patients scheduled for routine surgical procedures. Four piezoelectric microphones attached to the patients' backs were used to sample lung sounds during induction of anesthesia and endotracheal tube positioning. To achieve OLI, the endotracheal tube was inserted and advanced down the airway so that diminished or no breath sounds were heard on the left side of the chest. The tube was then withdrawn stepwise until equal breath sounds were heard. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy confirmed the tube's final position. Acoustic analyses were preformed by a new algorithm which assumes a Multiple Input Multiple Output system, in which a multidimensional Auto-Regressive model relates the input (lungs) and the output (recorded sounds) and a classifier, based on a Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test, indicates the number of ventilated lungs without reconstructing the original lung sounds from the recorded samples.

RESULTS: This algorithm achieved an OLI detection probability of 95.2% with a false alarm probability of 4.8%.

CONCLUSION: Higher detection values can be achieved at the price of a higher incidence of false alarms.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.