This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Epstein, R. H. Articles by Feinstein, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Epstein, R. H. Articles by Feinstein, D. M. Related Collections Economics and Health Care Research Technology

---

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Anesthesia Information Management Systems: A Survey of Current Implementation Policies and Practices

Richard H. Epstein, MD^*, Michael M. Vigoda, MD, MBA, and David M. Feinstein

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence to Richard H. Epstein, MD, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th Street, Suite 5480G, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Address e-mail to richard.epstein{at}jefferson.edu.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) implementation is increasing, but there are no published recommendations from anesthesia professional societies to guide configuration and policy decisions that affect billing, security, medical–legal, and compliance issues.

METHODS: A 45-question structured survey was developed by a committee of the Society for Technology in Anesthesia and was sent to the clinical administrator at 18 separate institutions, comprising six different installed AIMS systems. The primary goal of the survey was to establish a baseline of current policies and practices.

RESULTS: There was more than two-third agreement among respondents for only 25% of questions. A number of configurations reported may increase exposure to billing denial, Medicare and Medicaid noncompliance, security breeches, and medical–legal defense difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS: Developing guidelines by anesthesia professional organizations such as Society for Technology in Anesthesia to assist in the configuration of AIMS is recommended to help anesthesia departments avoid problems that may result in significant financial and legal risk.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. B. Egger Halbeis, R. H. Epstein, A. Macario, R. G. Pearl, and Z. Grunwald Adoption of Anesthesia Information Management Systems by Academic Departments in the United States Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1323 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]