This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kardash, K. Articles by Velly, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kardash, K. Articles by Velly, A. M. Related Collections Pain Medicine Regional Anesthesia

---

ANALGESIA

Obturator Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Ken Kardash, MD^*, Don Hickey, MD^*, Michael J. Tessler, MD^*, Stacey Payne, BScN, David Zukor, MD, and Ana Miriam Velly, DDS, PhD

From the Departments of *Anesthesia, Nursing, and Orthopedic Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; and Department of Diagnostic and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Address correspondence to Kenneth Kardash, MD, Anesthesia Department, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2. Address e-mail to kenneth.kardash{at}mcgill.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both femoral and obturator nerve blocks have been suggested to be useful in relieving pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We sought to compare their efficacy.

METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing elective unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia received in a randomized, double-blind manner a femoral, obturator, or sham nerve block at the end of surgery. Blocks were performed using nerve stimulation and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% containing epinephrine 5 µg/mL. Patient-controlled IV analgesia with fentanyl, celecoxib 100 mg PO bid, and acetaminophen 650 mg PO every 6 h were started on arrival in the recovery room. Pain (0–10 numeric rating scale, NRS) at rest and with movement, analgesic use, and side effects were recorded for 48 h. Maximum knee flexion and total days in hospital were recorded as functional outcomes.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the obturator block group and the control group in any outcome variable. With baseline pain scores subtracted, femoral block resulted in less pain at rest compared with control (NRS difference from baseline 2.1 ± 0.4 sem vs 3.4 ± 0.4, respectively; P = 0.02) and less pain with movement (NRS difference 2.6 ± 0.6, 4.3 ± 0.6, P = 0.05) at recovery room discharge. Neither block had a significant effect on opioid use, functional outcome, or side effects. Only one (5%) patient with femoral block developed obturator motor block.

CONCLUSION: Femoral nerve blocks rarely block the obturator nerve. Single-injection femoral nerve block improved multimodal analgesia after spinal anesthesia for TKA, but this effect did not persist beyond the day of surgery. Obturator nerve block alone was of no benefit.