JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1048-1052
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000280484.81216.76
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badal, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Trujillo, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badal, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Trujillo, D. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Equipment
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)
Right arrow Technology

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

A Simple Method to Determine Mixed Exhaled CO2 Using a Standard Circle Breathing Circuit

John J. Badal, MD, Robert G. Loeb, MD, FACS, and Dax K. Trujillo, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to John J. Badal, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ 85724. Address e-mail to jjbadal{at}yahoo.com.

INTRODUCTION: Mixed exhaled CO2 and CO2 excretion (VCO2) are not routinely monitored during anesthesia because they are difficult to measure using standard equipment. We conducted two experiments to test the hypothesis that the ventilator bellows contains mixed exhaled CO2.

METHODS: In the laboratory experiment, a lung model was assembled with a CO2 source. The gasses were sampled from the bellows and VCO2 was calculated. These values were compared to VCO2 measured by the NICO monitor (Novametrix Medical Systems), a commercially available mainstream capnometer. In the clinical experiment, gasses were sampled from the ventilator bellows in nine subjects under general anesthesia. VCO2 was calculated and compared to values obtained from the NICO monitor.

RESULTS: VCO2 measured from the bellows connected to the lung model resulted in an overall precision of 26 mL/min, bias of –24 mL/min, and average error of –12.0% compared to set CO2 flow. In the clinical trial, calculated VCO2 sampled from the bellows compared to measured VCO2 from the NICO monitor had a bias of –0.15 mL/min, and precision of 33.16 mL/min.

CONCLUSION: VCO2 calculated from the bellows was not as accurate as NICO VCO2 in the laboratory; however, it can be done using standard anesthesia equipment. Furthermore, in nine anesthetized subjects, the bellows method of VCO2 determination had an overall percent error of 1.34% from NICO VCO2. Given this small percent error between the bellows method and the NICO monitor, we believe that the bellows method of VCO2 determination is suitable for clinical practice.






Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.