This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moppett, I. K. Articles by Hardman, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moppett, I. K. Articles by Hardman, J. G. Related Collections Neuroanesthesia Technology

---

NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY

Modeling the Causes of Variation in Brain Tissue Oxygenation

From the Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Queen’s Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK.

Address correspondence to Iain K. Moppett, DM, FRCA, Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Queen’s Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. Address e-mail to iain.moppett{at}nottingham.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical markers of the adequacy of cerebral perfusion may be misleading. The effects of isolated changes in systemic blood pressure, Paco₂, Pao₂, and cerebral edema on cerebral blood flow and oxygenation are relatively well known, but the quantitative effects of interactions between these factors are not easily calculated. We aimed to investigate the relationship between these factors using a computational model.

METHODS: Using a validated, quantitative, computational model of cerebral blood flow, the simulated effects of changes in systemic blood pressure (50–180 mm Hg), Paco₂ (33–55 mm Hg [4.3–7.3 kPa]), Sao₂ (0.8–1.0), and cerebral edema (0%–10% increase in intercapillary distance) on middle cerebral artery flow velocity (MCAFV), brain tissue oxygenation (Pbo₂), and jugular venous oxygen saturation (Sjo₂) were recorded.

RESULTS: Individual markers of adequacy of cerebral perfusion (MCAFV, Sjo₂, and Pbo₂) behave in accordance with clinical data with single changes in the parameters studied: the lower limit of autoregulation for MCAFV and Sjo₂ lies around 60 mm Hg mean arterial blood pressure. In our model, the upper limit of autoregulation lies around 170 mm Hg, but is much less distinct for Sjo₂ and Pbo₂ than for MCAFV. Significant cerebral ischemia appears unlikely to occur with isolated physiological changes according to our simulation. However, the combination of hypotension, hypoxia, and edema makes ischemia much more likely in this model. Edema increases the Sjo₂:Pbo₂ gradient, confirming that diffusion-limited oxygen delivery may make Sjo₂ values falsely reassuring.

CONCLUSION: The simulated effects of pathophysiological changes on cerebral oxygenation and perfusion have been quantitatively described. Significant cerebral ischemia is predicted in the presence of two or more physiological derangements. Cerebral edema is associated with an increased gradient between Sjo₂ and Pbo₂.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. K. Moppett, P. Brassard, T. Seifert, and N. H. Secher Sympathetic activity and cerebral oxygenation Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2009; 103(5): 769 - 770. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. K. Moppett and J. G. Hardman Development and Validation of an Integrated Computational Model of Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxygenation Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1094 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]