JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1312-1318
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278148.56305.72
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dingley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dingley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Equipment
Right arrow Technology
Right arrow Pharmacology


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

A Cryogenic Machine for Selective Recovery of Xenon from Breathing System Waste Gases

John Dingley, MD*, and Rod S. Mason, PhD{dagger}

From the *Clinical School, and {dagger}Department of Chemistry, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK.

Address correspondence to John Dingley, MD, University of Wales Swansea, The Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 OUL, UK. Address e-mail to john.dingley{at}morrnhst-tr.wales.nhs.uk.

BACKGROUND: Xenon has many characteristics that make it very attractive as an anesthetic and therapeutic drug. Unfortunately, the supply of xenon is fixed, and therefore reclamation and recovery from even the most efficient breathing circuits is desirable. We built and evaluated a cryogenic device to recover xenon from waste anesthetic gases.

METHODS: Xenon was selectively frozen to –139.2°C from test gas mixtures at ambient pressure (STP). The machine ran on standard 240 V 13 A electrical current without refrigerants that required replenishing, e.g., liquid nitrogen. A wide range of xenon/oxygen mixtures were processed over a range of freezing chamber temperatures. Efflux gas and thawed reclaimed xenon were collected separately. Xenon purity and yield (fraction recovered) were measured and calculated on each occasion.

RESULTS: Gas was processed at 300 mL/min, and the operating temperature was –139.2 (0.096)°C [Mean (sd)]. Purity and yield were >90% and >70% for gas mixtures containing ≥20% xenon, increasing to >95% and >85%, respectively, with an input gas xenon fraction ≥40%. Efficiency improved linearly with reducing temperature.

CONCLUSIONS: Xenon of high purity (>90%) and yield (>70%) for such a machine was recovered from all gas mixtures containing ≥20% xenon. The operating temperature of the freezing chamber is a major influence on the efficiency of recovery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Rawat and J. Dingley
Closed-Circuit Xenon Delivery Using a Standard Anesthesia Workstation
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2010; 110(1): 101 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.