JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1675-1680
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287818.46240.83
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buffington, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buffington, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I., II
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Preclinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pharmacology


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Concentrations of Isoflurane Exceeding Those Used Clinically Slightly Increase the Affinity of Methane, but Not Toluene, for Water

Charles W. Buffington, MD*, Michael J. Laster, DVM{dagger}, Katarzyna Jankowska, DVM{dagger}, and Edmond I. Eger, II, MD{dagger}

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Charles W. Buffington, N463 MUH, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Address e-mail to BuffingtonCW{at}anes.upmc.eu.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled anesthetics may affect proteins at the interface between membrane lipids and the surrounding aqueous phase. The underlying solution chemistry is not known. Because the hydrophobicity of nonpolar protein components importantly influences their conformation, we tested the hypothesis that isoflurane affects the solubility of two nonpolar compounds, methane and toluene, in saline.

METHODS: Using a serial dilution technique, we determined the saline:gas partition coefficients (PCs) of methane and toluene at 37°C in the absence of isoflurane and in the presence of approximately 1%, 5%, and 15% isoflurane. We also measured the effect on the vapor pressure of benzene produced by saturating benzene with either cyclopropane or chloroethane, anesthetics used in a previous study to demonstrate that their equilibration with benzene decreased the solubility of benzene in water.

RESULTS: Clinically relevant concentrations of isoflurane (1% and 5%) did not affect the saline:gas PC of methane and toluene, but 15%–20% isoflurane increased the PC of methane (P < 0.05) but not toluene. Saturating benzene with cyclopropane or chloroethane, decreased the vapor pressure of benzene in proportion to the amount of anesthetic dissolved in the benzene.

CONCLUSION: Isoflurane has a weak antihydrophobic effect at concentrations far above the clinically relevant range, and this effect is unlikely to explain how anesthetics act. A previous study, which found that cyclopropane and chloroethane decreased the solubility of benzene in water, probably erred in its conclusion that these anesthetics interfered with the interaction of benzene and water. Instead, the anesthetics simply decreased the vapor pressure of benzene, doing so in accordance with Raoult's Law.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.