JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1711-1713
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000286150.99529.f0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wax, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wax, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics and Health Care Research


ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND POLICY

Changes in Utilization of Intraoperative Laboratory Testing Associated with the Introduction of Point-of-Care Testing Devices in an Academic Department

David B. Wax, MD, and David L. Reich, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, New York.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to David Wax, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1010, New York, NY 10029. Address e-mail to david.wax{at}mssm.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Availability of point-of-care testing (POCT) technology may lead to unnecessary testing and expense without improving outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that frequency of intraoperative blood testing (IBT) would increase in association with installation of POCT devices in our surgical suites.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 38,115 electronic anesthesia records for cases performed in the 1 yr before and 1 yr after POCT installation. For each case, the frequency of IBT was tabulated and the change in frequency of IBT between the study periods was calculated for individual anesthesiologists, for the department as a whole, and for clusters of anesthetizing locations.

RESULTS: For the department as a whole, there was no significant change between the before and after study periods in the 13% proportion of cases in which IBT was obtained. For cases in which IBT was used, there was no significant increase in the number of IBTs per case.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant increase in the overall utilization of IBT associated with POCT presence in noncardiothoracic operating rooms.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.