JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2007; 105:1848-1851
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000286135.21333.fd
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, P. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain Medicine
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia


ANALGESIA

Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Study

Jytte F. Moller, MD, PhD*, Lone Nikolajsen, MD, PhD*{dagger}, Svein Aage Rodt, MD, PhD*, Hanne Ronning, MD{ddagger}, and Palle S. Carlsson, MD, PhD*

From the *Department of Anesthesiology; {dagger}Danish Pain Research Center; and {ddagger}Department of Abdominal Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Address correspondence to Lone Nikolajsen, MD, PhD, Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Norrebrogade 44, Bldg. 1 A, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Address e-mail to nikolajsen{at}dadlnet.dk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined in this randomized, double-blind study whether a multilevel paravertebral block performed before general anesthesia with propofol and a laryngeal mask enhances postoperative analgesia after breast cancer surgery.

METHODS: Eighty-eight patients were randomized to receive paravertebral injections with either ropivacaine 0.5% (30 mL) or an equivalent amount of isotonic saline. Nine patients were excluded after randomization, thus 79 patients remained for evaluation (ropivacaine, n = 38; placebo, n = 41). Variables of efficacy were the amount of fentanyl delivered by the patient-controlled analgesia device in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative pain measured on a numeric rating scale at regular intervals from the day of surgery and until the second postoperative day.

RESULTS: The median consumption of fentanyl in the PACU was less in the ropivacaine group compared with the placebo group (0 µg [range: 0–250 µg] versus 100 µg [range: 0–800 µg], P = 0.001). Also, fewer patients in the ropivacaine group reported pain ≥3 on the numbers rating scale in the PACU (13 vs 31, P < 0.0001). No statistical difference in pain scores or consumption of analgesics could be demonstrated after discharge from the PACU.

CONCLUSIONS: A multilevel paravertebral block provides good analgesia for breast surgery, but the duration of analgesia is briefer than described in previous studies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Ben-Ari, M. Moreno, J. E. Chelly, and P. E. Bigeleisen
Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block Using an Intercostal Approach
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1691 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.