JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:535-537
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181605543
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herff, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herff, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care
Right arrow Resuscitation


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Minimizing Stomach Inflation Versus Optimizing Chest Compressions

Holger Herff, MD, Peter Paal, MD, Achim von Goedecke, MD, MSc, Thomas Mitterlechner, MD, Thomas Danninger, BSc, and Volker Wenzel, MD, MSc

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Holger Herff, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Address e-mail to holger.herff{at}i-med.ac.at.

In a bench model, we evaluated a bag-valve device (Smart Bag® MO) with limited maximum inspiratory gas flow developed to reduce the risk of stomach inflation in an unprotected airway. During simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions, ventilation with the "disabled" Smart Bag® MO or an adult self-inflating bag-valve device provided only adequate tidal volumes if inspiratory time was 0.5 s. Ventilation with the "enabled" Smart Bag® MO, even in ventilation windows of 0.5 s, provided inadequate tidal volumes during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and would result in hypoventilation in a patient.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Herff, P. Paal, A. von Goedecke, T. Mitterlechner, C. A. Schmittinger, and V. Wenzel
Ventilation Strategies in the Obstructed Airway in a Bench Model Simulating a Nonintubated Respiratory Arrest Patient
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2009; 108(5): 1585 - 1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.