This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cooper, J. B. Articles by Singla, A. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cooper, J. B. Articles by Singla, A. K.

---

ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND POLICY

Differences in Safety Climate Among Hospital Anesthesia Departments and the Effect of a Realistic Simulation-Based Training Program

Jeffrey B. Cooper, PhD^*, Richard H. Blum, MD, John S. Carroll, PhD, Mark Dershwitz, MD, PhD^||, David M. Feinstein, MD^¶, David M. Gaba, MD^#, John C. Morey, PhD^**, and Aneesh K. Singla, MD, MPH^*

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts; MIT Sloan School of Management and Engineering Systems Division, Cambridge, Massachusetts; ||Department of Anesthesiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts; ¶Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and #VA Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California **Consultant, Medford, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jeffrey B. Cooper, PhD, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., RSL 335, Boston, MA 02114. Address e-mail to jcooper{at}partners.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Safety climate is often measured via surveys to identify appropriate patient safety interventions. The introduction of an insurance premium incentive for simulation-based anesthesia crisis resource management (CRM) training motivated our naturalistic experiment to compare the safety climates of several departments and to assess the impact of the training.

METHODS: We administered a 59-item survey to anesthesia providers in six academic anesthesia programs (Phase 1). Faculty in four of the programs subsequently participated in a CRM program using simulation. The survey was readministered 3 yr later (Phase 2). Factor analysis was used to create scales regarding common safety themes. Positive safety climate (% of respondents with positive safety attitudes) was computed for the scales to indicate the safety climate levels.

RESULTS: The usable response rate was 44% (309/708) and 38% (293/772) in Phases 1 and 2 respectively. There was wide variation in response rates among hospitals and providers. Eight scales were identified. There were significantly different climate scores among hospitals but no difference between the trained and untrained cohorts. The positive safety climate scores varied from 6% to 94% on specific survey questions. Faculty and residents had significantly different perceptions of the degree to which residents are debriefed about their difficult clinical situations.

CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate indicators can vary substantially among anesthesia practice groups. Scale scores and responses to specific questions can suggest practices for improvement. Overall safety climate is probably not a good criterion for assessing the impact of simulation-based CRM training. Training alone was insufficient to alter engrained behaviors in the absence of further reinforcing actions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. W. Hartmann, M. Meterko, A. K. Rosen, Shibei Zhao, P. Shokeen, S. Singer, and D. M. Gaba Relationship of Hospital Organizational Culture to Patient Safety Climate in the Veterans Health Administration Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2009; 66(3): 320 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF]