This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kooij, F. O. Articles by Kal, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kooij, F. O. Articles by Kal, J. E. Related Collections Economics and Health Care Research Complications Pharmacology

---

ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND POLICY

Decision Support Increases Guideline Adherence for Prescribing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis

Fabian O. Kooij, MD^*, Toni Klok, MD^*, Markus W. Hollmann, MD, PhD, DEAA, and Jasper E. Kal, MD, PhD^*

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Markus W. Hollmann, MD, PhD, DEAA, Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Address e-mail to m.w.hollmann{at}amc.uva.nl.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prevention are implemented widely but their effectiveness may be limited by poor adherence. We hypothesized that the use of an electronic decision support (DS) system would significantly improve guideline adherence.

METHODS: Medical information of all patients undergoing elective surgery in our regional teaching hospital is routinely entered in an anesthesia information management system at the preoperative screening clinic. Our departmental PONV prevention guidelines identifies patients as "high-risk" and thus eligible for PONV prophylaxis based on the presence of at least three of the following risk factors: female gender, history of PONV or motion sickness, nonsmoker status, and anticipated use of postoperative opioids. Using automated reminders, we studied the effect of DS on guidelines adherence using an off–on–off design. In these three study periods, we queried for all consecutive patients visiting the preoperative screening clinic who were eligible for PONV prophylaxis and studied how often it was prescribed correctly.

RESULTS: Between November 2005 and June 2006, 1340, 2715, and 1035 patients were included in the control, DS and post-DS periods, respectively. As a result of mandatory data entry of risk factors, the percentage of high-risk PONV patients increased from 28% in the control period to 32% and 31% in the DS and post-DS periods, respectively. During the control period, 38% of all high-risk patients were prescribed PONV prophylaxis. This increased to 73% during the DS period and decreased to 37% in the post-DS period.

CONCLUSION: Electronic DS increases guidelines adherence for the prescription of PONV prophylaxis in high-risk PONV patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Kranke, N. Roewer, A. F. Smith, S. N. Piper, J. Wallenborn, and L. H. J. Eberhart Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: What Are We Waiting For? Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 1049 - 1050. [Full Text] [PDF]