JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1039-1048
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318163f6a9
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beattie, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tait, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beattie, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tait, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Outcomes
Right arrow Clinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pharmacology


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY

Does Tight Heart Rate Control Improve Beta-Blocker Efficacy? An Updated Analysis of the Noncardiac Surgical Randomized Trials

W. Scott Beattie, MD, PhD*, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, MD{dagger}, Keyvan Karkouti, MD, MSc{dagger}, Stuart McCluskey, MD, PhD*, and Gordon Tait, PhD*

From the Departments of *Anesthesia, and {dagger}Health Policy Management, and Evaluation/Clinical Epidemiology, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to W. Scott Beattie, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesia, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, EN 3-450 200 Elizabeth St., Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada. Address e-mail to scott.beattie{at}uhn.on.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses assessing the efficacy of perioperative β-blockade trials have failed to show a reduction in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Tight control of heart rate (HR) has been suggested to improve these outcomes. Meta-analyses have not considered the influence of tight HR control on the efficacy of perioperative β-blockade.

METHODS: Using previously published search strategies, we identified all randomized trials evaluating perioperative β-blockers after noncardiac surgery. This search yielded 10 trials with 2176 patients. We used the data from these studies to correlate measures of HR control with major postoperative outcomes, primarily in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and metaregression was performed correlating measures of HR control with MI.

RESULTS: The combined results of all studies did not show a significant cardioprotective effect of β-blockers, with considerable heterogeneity among the studies (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.4–1.4; P = 0.38 heterogeneity: I2 = 34%). However, grouping the trials on the basis of maximal HR showed that trials where the estimated maximal HR was <100 bpm were associated with cardioprotection (OR = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.08–0.65; P = 0.005) whereas trials where the estimated maximal HR was >100 bpm did not demonstrate cardioprotection (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.79–1.80; P = 0.43) with no heterogeneity. Moreover, metaregression of the HR response to β-blockade against the log OR of postoperative MI demonstrated a linear association between the effect of β-blockade on the mean, maximal, and variation in HR and the OR of an MI (r2 = 0.63; P < 0.001) where a larger effect of β-blockers on HR was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative MI. Across all studies, β-blockade resulted in a reduction in postoperative HR (weighted mean difference: 8.6 bpm; 95% CI = –9.6 to –7.6; I2 = 85.3%) with considerable heterogeneity. This large heterogeneity in HR response to β-blockade was found to be related, in part, to the type of β-blocker, specifically, metoprolol, and the concomitant use of calcium channel blockers. Calcium channel blocker use and β-blockers other than metoprolol resulted in more effective control of HR. There was wide variability in the HR response to β-blockade. Twenty-five percent of patients receiving β-blockers had episodes when the HRs were more than 100 bpm, although 15% of placebo patients also had bradycardia, which would have required a dose reduction had they been administered β-blockers. Finally, this analysis found that perioperative β-blockade was associated with an increased incidence of bradycardia (OR = 3.49; 95% CI = 2.4–5.9) and congestive heart failure (OR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.00–2.8).

CONCLUSIONS: The trials that achieve the most effective control of HR are associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative MI, suggesting that effective control of HR is important for achieving cardioprotection. Second, this analysis demonstrates that administration of β-blockers does not reliably decrease HRs in all patients, and may be associated with increased side effects. Judicious use of combination therapy with other drugs may be necessary to achieve effective postoperative control of HR.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, L. A. Fleisher, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 24, 2009; 54(22): e13 - e118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, K. E. Fleischmann, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 24, 2009; 54(22): 2102 - 2128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
2009 WRITING GROUP TO REVIEW NEW EVIDENCE AND UPDA, K. E. Fleischmann, J. A. Beckman, C. E. Buller, H. Calkins, L. A. Fleisher, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation, November 24, 2009; 120(21): 2123 - 2151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
2007 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation, November 24, 2009; 120(21): e169 - e276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, D. Poldermans, J. J. Bax, E. Boersma, S. De Hert, E. Eeckhout, G. Fowkes, B. Gorenek, M. G. Hennerici, B. Iung, et al.
Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: The Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA)
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2769 - 2812.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Landesberg, W. S. Beattie, M. Mosseri, A. S. Jaffe, and J. S. Alpert
Perioperative Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, June 9, 2009; 119(22): 2936 - 2944.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
C. Marshall, P. H. Lin, T. T. Huynh, and P. Kougias
How Optimal is the Medical Management of Patients Prior to Major Reconstructive Vascular Surgery? The Results of a Cross-sectional Study
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, June 1, 2009; 43(3): 238 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Boutonnet, S. Ausset, E. Lambert, G. de Saint Maurice, Y. Auroy, H. Berbari, and B. Lenoir
Acute Myocardial Ischemia After Perioperative Beta-Blocking
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2009; 108(5): 1718 - 1720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. M. Biccard and S. J. Howell
Calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, and perioperative cardiovascular stability
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 439 - 441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. W. Sear, J. W. Giles, G. Howard-Alpe, and P. Foex
Perioperative beta-blockade, 2008: What does POISE tell us, and was our earlier caution justified?
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 135 - 138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. J. London
Quo Vadis, Perioperative Beta Blockade? Are You "POISE'd" on the Brink?
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1025 - 1030.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.