JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1566-1571
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278866.01963.79
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayr, V. D.
Right arrow Articles by Strohmenger, H.-U.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayr, V. D.
Right arrow Articles by Strohmenger, H.-U.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Preclinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Patient Safety
Right arrow Pharmacology


PATIENT SAFETY

A Comparison of the Combination of Epinephrine and Vasopressin with Lipid Emulsion in a Porcine Model of Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest After Intravenous Injection of Bupivacaine

Viktoria D. Mayr, MD*, Lukas Mitterschiffthaler, BS*, Andreas Neurauter, MEng*, Christian Gritsch, MRer.nat.*, Volker Wenzel, MD*, Tilko Müller, MD{dagger}, Günter Luckner, MD*, Karl H. Lindner, MD*, and Hans-Ulrich Strohmenger, MD*

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and {dagger}Urology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Viktoria Mayr, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Address e-mail to viktoria.mayr{at}i-med.ac.at.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a porcine model, we compared the effect of the combination of vasopressin/epinephrine with that of a lipid emulsion on survival after bupivacaine- induced cardiac arrest.

METHODS: After administration of 5 mg/kg of a 0.5% bupivacaine solution IV, ventilation was interrupted for 2 ± 0.5 (mean ± sd) min until asystole occurred. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated after 1 min of untreated cardiac arrest. After 2 min of CPR, 10 animals received, every 5 min, either vasopressin combined with epinephrine or 4 mL/kg of a 20% lipid emulsion. Three minutes after each drug administration, up to three countershocks (4, 4, and 6 J/kg) were administered; all subsequent shocks with 6 J/kg. Blood for determination of the plasma bupivacaine concentration was drawn throughout the experiment.

RESULTS: In the vasopressor group, all five pigs survived, whereas none of five pigs in the lipid group had restoration of spontaneous circulation (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between groups in the plasma concentration of total bupivacaine.

CONCLUSION: In this model of a bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest, the vasopressor combination of vasopressin and epinephrine compared with lipid emulsion resulted in higher coronary perfusion pressure during CPR and survival rates.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. L. Weinberg
Lipid Infusion Therapy: Translation to Clinical Practice
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1340 - 1342.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.