This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Siu, L. Articles by Monagle, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Siu, L. Articles by Monagle, J.

---

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING AND SIMULATION

Does Patient Position Influence Doppler Signal Quality from the USCOM Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor?

From the Department of Anaesthesia, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. LWL Siu, Department of Anaesthesia, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Victoria, 3168. Address e-mail to lysiu{at}yahoo.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The USCOM1A continuous wave cardiac output monitor (USCOM Pty Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia) is a novel Doppler-based device used to measure cardiac output noninvasively. The proper alignment of the transducer, and hence the ultrasound beam to the aortic or pulmonary outflow tracts, is essential to acquire accurate measurements and often much time is spent on transducer and/or patient positioning. In this prospective, observational, crossover study, we investigated the effect of patient positioning on the acquisition of cardiac output measurement with USCOM1A.

METHODS: We measured cardiac output using USCOM1A in 30 healthy adult volunteers, each in five different positions: sitting, supine, Trendelenburg (20 degrees), left lateral tilt (20 degrees), and right lateral tilt (20 degrees) and compared the time required to obtain acceptable measurements. We also compared the quality of the Doppler signal obtained in these positions using a scoring system designed for this study.

RESULTS: There was a higher rate of failed measurement, the mean time to obtain the first acceptable measurement was prolonged and the optimal measurement obtained within a 5-min period was of a lower quality in the sitting position compared with the other four positions.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested the sitting position is the least suitable and least reliable position in which to perform cardiac output measurements using USCOM1A compared with the supine, Trendelenburg (20 degrees), left lateral tilt (20 degrees), and right lateral tilt (20 degrees) positions.