JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1910-1915
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318173280f
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sauter, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Klaastad, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sauter, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Klaastad, O.

ANALGESIA

Electrical Nerve Stimulation or Ultrasound Guidance for Lateral Sagittal Infraclavicular Blocks: A Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blinded, Comparative Study

Axel R. Sauter, MD*, Michael S. Dodgson, FRCA{dagger}, Audun Stubhaug, DMSc{dagger}, Anne Marie Halstensen, CRNA{dagger}, and Øivind Klaastad, DMSc{dagger}

*Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and {dagger}Division of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Axel R. Sauter, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo, Norway. Address e-mail to sauter{at}start.no.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guidance is frequently used to perform infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. In this study, we compared electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound guidance for the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block.

METHODS: Eighty patients, ASA 1–2, were randomized for either nerve stimulation (group NS) or ultrasound-guided blocks (group US). The brachial plexus was anesthetized with 0.6 mL/kg mepivacaine (15 mg/mL) with epinephrine (2.5 µg/mL) in both groups. For ultrasound-guided blocks, local anesthetic was injected cranioposterior to the axillary artery. An observer who was blinded for the method assessed the blocks and questioned the patients. Successful block was defined as analgesia or anesthesia of all five nerves distal to the elbow. The main outcome variables were the time until readiness for surgery, quantified discomfort during the block, and pain related to tourniquet ischemia on a numeric rating scale (0–10).

RESULTS: Block performance time was 4.3 min (sd 1.3) and 4.1 min (sd 1.3) (P = 0.64) in group NS and group US, respectively. Onset time for sensory block was 13.7 min (sd 6.6) and 13.9 min (sd 5.8), (P = 0.99). The time until readiness for surgery was 18.1 min in both groups (sd 6.6 and 6.0) (P = 0.99). Median discomfort related to the block procedure was 1 in both groups (P = 0.92), and median tourniquet pain was 0.5 in group NS and 1 in group US (P = 32). Differences in success rates, between 85% in group NS and 95% in group US, were not significant (P = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that favorable results can be obtained when either nerve stimulation or ultrasound guidance is used for lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. Using ultrasound, local anesthetic injection cranioposterior to the artery appears feasible.






Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.