This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lecomte, P. Articles by Cammu, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lecomte, P. Articles by Cammu, G. Related Collections Cardiovascular Physiology

---

CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY

Dynamic Tight Glycemic Control During and After Cardiac Surgery Is Effective, Feasible, and Safe

Patrick Lecomte, MD^*, Luc Foubert, MD, PhD^*, Frank Nobels, MD, PhD, José Coddens, MD^*, Guy Nollet, MD^*, Filip Casselman, MD, PhD, Paul Van Crombrugge, MD, Geert Vandenbroucke, MD^*, and Guy Cammu, MD, PhD^*

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Endocrinology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to L. Foubert, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium. Address e-mail to Luc.Foubert{at}olvz-aalst.be.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tight blood glucose control reduces mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients, but intraoperative glucose control during cardiac surgery is often difficult, and risks hypoglycemia. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a nurse-driven insulin protocol (the Aalst Glycemia Insulin Protocol) for achieving a target glucose level of 80–110 mg/dL during cardiac surgery and in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS: We included 483 nondiabetics and 168 diabetics scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. To anticipate rapid perioperative changes in insulin requirement and/or sensitivity during surgery, we developed a dynamic algorithm presented in tabular form, with rows representing blood glucose ranges and columns representing insulin dosages based on the patients’ insulin sensitivity. The algorithm adjusts insulin dosage based on blood glucose level and the projected insulin sensitivity (e.g., reduced sensitivity during cardiopulmonary bypass and normalizing sensitivity after surgery).

RESULTS: A total of 18,893 blood glucose measurements were made during and after surgery. During surgery, the mean glucose level in nondiabetic patients was within targeted levels except during (112 ± 17 mg/dL) and after rewarming (113 ± 19 mg/dL) on cardiopulmonary bypass. In diabetics, blood glucose was decreased from 121 ± 40 mg/dL at anesthesia induction to 112 ± 26 mg/dL at the end of surgery (P < 0.05), with 52.9% of patients achieving the target. In the ICU, the mean glucose level was within targeted range at all time points, except for diabetics upon ICU arrival (113 ± 24 mg/dL). Of all blood glucose measurements (operating room and ICU), 68.0% were within the target, with 0.12% of measurements in nondiabetics and 0.18% in diabetics below 60 mg/dL. Hypoglycemia < 50 mg/dL was avoided in all but four (0.6%) patients (40 mg/dL was the lowest observed value).

CONCLUSIONS: The Aalst Glycemia Insulin Protocol is effective for maintaining tight perioperative blood glucose control during cardiac surgery with minimal risk of hypoglycemia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Van den Berghe, M. Schetz, D. Vlasselaers, G. Hermans, A. Wilmer, R. Bouillon, and D. Mesotten Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven Blood Glucose Target? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 3163 - 3170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Blaha, P. Kopecky, M. Matias, R. Hovorka, J. Kunstyr, T. Kotulak, M. Lips, D. Rubes, M. Stritesky, J. Lindner, et al. Comparison of Three Protocols for Tight Glycemic Control in Cardiac Surgery Patients Diabetes Care, May 1, 2009; 32(5): 757 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]