| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||



From the *Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California;
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, UCSF; and
Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and Department of Biopharmaceutical Science, University of CA at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Address correspondence to Jan F. A. Hendrickx, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium. Address e-mail to jcnwahendrickx{at}yahoo.com.
BACKGROUND: Drug interactions may reveal mechanisms of drug action: additive interactions suggest a common site of action, and synergistic interactions suggest different sites of action. We applied this reasoning in a review of published data on anesthetic drug interactions for the end-points of hypnosis and immobility.
METHODS: We searched Medline for all manuscripts listing propofol, etomidate, methohexital, thiopental, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil, remifentanil, droperidol, metoclopramide, lidocaine, halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, N2O, and Xe that contained terms suggesting interaction: interaction, additive, additivity, synergy, synergism, synergistic, antagonism, antagonistic, isobologram, or isobolographic. When available, data were reanalyzed using fraction analysis or response surface analysis.
RESULTS: Between drug classes, most interactions were synergistic. The major exception was ketamine, which typically interacted in either an additive or infra-additive (antagonistic) manner. Inhaled anesthetics typically showed synergy with IV anesthetics, but were additive or, in the case of nitrous oxide and isoflurane, possibly infra-additive, with each other.
CONCLUSIONS: Except for ketamine, IV anesthetics acting at different sites usually demonstrated synergy. Inhaled anesthetics usually demonstrated synergy with IV anesthetics, but no pair of inhaled anesthetics interacted synergistically.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. B. Kelz and R. G. Eckenhoff Does It Add Up? Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 365 - 366. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. Eger II, M. Tang, M. Liao, M. J. Laster, K. Solt, P. Flood, A. Jenkins, D. Raines, J. F. Hendrickx, S. L. Shafer, et al. Inhaled Anesthetics Do Not Combine to Produce Synergistic Effects Regarding Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration in Rats Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 479 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jenkins, I. A. Lobo, D. Gong, J. R. Trudell, K. Solt, R. A. Harris, and E. I. Eger II General Anesthetics Have Additive Actions on Three Ligand Gated Ion Channels Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 486 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Shafer, J. F. A. Hendrickx, P. Flood, J. Sonner, and E. I. Eger II Additivity Versus Synergy: A Theoretical Analysis of Implications for Anesthetic Mechanisms Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 507 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|