JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1265-1275
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181806212
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meier, T.
Right arrow Articles by Stamme, C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meier, T.
Right arrow Articles by Stamme, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care
Right arrow Ventilation
Right arrow Inflammation


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Pulmonary Cytokine Responses During Mechanical Ventilation of Noninjured Lungs With and Without End-Expiratory Pressure

Torsten Meier, MD*, Alexandra Lange*, Hilke Papenberg, MD*, Malte Ziemann, MD*, Christina Fentrop, PhD{dagger}, Ulrike Uhlig, PhD{dagger}, Peter Schmucker, MD*, Stefan Uhlig, PhD{dagger}, and Cordula Stamme, MD{ddagger}

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany; {dagger}Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; and {ddagger}Research Group Cellular Pneumology, Research Center Borstel, Germany.

Address correspondence to Stefan Uhlig, PhD, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, Wendlingweg 2, 52074 Aachen, Germany. Address e-mail to suhlig{at}ukaachen.de.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during mechanical ventilation may impose different degrees of stress on healthy lungs. On the assumption that stress is reflected by cytokine production, we performed a translational study investigating the effect of PEEP on bronchoalveolar and systemic mediator levels in isolated perfused mouse lungs (IPL) and in patients with healthy lungs.

METHODS: (Part I) IPL were ventilated with end-expiratory pressures of 0, 3, 6, or 10 cm H2O and end-inspiratory pressure (EIP) levels of 10 or 25 cm H2O. Interleukin (IL)-6 and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 concentrations in the venous effluate were monitored. (Part II) Patients (nonsmokers) scheduled for elective otorhinolaryngology surgery (duration >90 min) were randomized to receive either ventilation with zero end-expiratory pressure or PEEP (10 cm H2O). Mediators in bronchoalveolar lavage, nuclear factor {kappa}B, (NF-{kappa}B)-activation in alveolar macrophages and circulating systemic mediators were monitored. Control patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage after intubation.

RESULTS: In the IPL, mediator concentrations increased with increasing end-expiratory pressure at an EIP of 10 cm H2O, but decreased at 25 cm H2O EIP. In patients, bronchoalveolar IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor were increased by ventilation regardless of the PEEP level. IL-6 and IL-8 levels were moderately increased by PEEP but not zero end-expiratory pressure. Nuclear factor {kappa}B DNA binding activity in alveolar macrophages and systemic mediator levels did not change.

CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the premise that cytokine levels may indicate mechanical stress, our findings indicate that even low tidal volume ventilation causes some stress. PEEP is beneficial at high inspiratory pressure, but imposes moderate stress at low inspiratory pressure.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.