This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taboada, M. Articles by Atanassoff, P. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taboada, M. Articles by Atanassoff, P. G. Related Collections Drug Delivery Regional Anesthesia

---

ANALGESIA

A "New" Automated Bolus Technique for Continuous Popliteal Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison with a Continuous Infusion Technique

Manuel Taboada, MD^*, Jaime Rodríguez, MD, PhD^*, Maria Bermudez, MD^*, Cristina Valiño, MD, Beatriz Ulloa, MD^*, Francisco Aneiros, MD^*, Francisco Gude, MD, Joaquín Cortés, MD, PhD^*, Julian Alvarez, MD, PhD^*, and Peter G. Atanassoff, MD

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Meixoeiro, CHUVI, Vigo, Spain; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, University of Santiago de Compostela. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Spain; and Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine. New Haven, Connecticut.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Travesía da Choupana s/n. 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Address e-mail to manutabo{at}yahoo.es.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We designed the present, prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the administration of an automated intermittent bolus dose with a conventional technique of continuous infusion of local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia in continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade.

METHODS: Forty-four patients undergoing hallux valgus repair were randomly assigned to receive either a continuous infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine with an infusion rate of 5 mL/h (continuous infusion group, n = 22) or automated bolus doses of 5 mL every hour of the same local anesthetic (automated bolus group, n = 22) for 24 h. Postoperative pain scores were assessed using a verbal rating pain score. The amount of rescue tramadol medication for pain was also recorded.

RESULTS: In patients of the automated bolus group there was a reduction in pain scores (P < 0.05) during the postoperative period, when compared to patients of the continuous infusion group. Five patients in the automated bolus group (24%) and 11 patients of the continuous group (52%) required rescue tramadol analgesia (P = 0.055).

CONCLUSION: The present investigation demonstrated that local anesthetic administered by an automated bolus technique provided better postoperative pain relief than a continuous infusion technique for continuous popliteal nerve block after foot surgery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Fredrickson and D. J. Price Analgesic effectiveness of ropivacaine 0.2% vs 0.4% via an ultrasound-guided C5-6 root/superior trunk perineural ambulatory catheter Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2009; 103(3): 434 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]