This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Friedman, Z. Articles by Naik, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Friedman, Z. Articles by Naik, V. Related Collections Airway Resuscitation Education

---

ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND POLICY

Teaching Lifesaving Procedures: The Impact of Model Fidelity on Acquisition and Transfer of Cricothyrotomy Skills to Performance on Cadavers

Zeev Friedman, MD^*, Kong E. You-Ten, MD, PhD, FRCPC^*, Matthew D. Bould, MB ChB, MRCP, FRCA, and Viren Naik, MD, MEd, FRCPC

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; and Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.

Address correspondence to Zeev Friedman, MD, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Ave., Toronto M5G1X5, ON, Canada. Address e-mail to zeev.friedman{at}uhn.on.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A decline in emergency surgical airway procedures in recent years has resulted in a decreased exposure to cricothyrotomy. Consequently, residents have very little experience or confidence in performing this intervention. In this study, we compared cricothyrotomy skills acquired on a simple inexpensive model to those learned on a high fidelity simulator using valid evaluation instruments and testing on cadavers.

METHODS: First and second year anesthesiology residents were recruited. All subjects performed a videotaped pretest cricothyrotomy on cadavers. Subjects were randomized into two groups: The high fidelity group (n = 11) performed two cricothyrotomies on a full-scale simulator with an anatomically accurate larynx. The low fidelity group (n = 11) performed two cricothyrotomies on a low fidelity model constructed from corrugated tubing. Within 2 wk all subjects performed a posttest. Two blinded examiners graded and timed the performances using a checklist and a global rating scale.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the change from pretest to posttest performance between the model groups as evaluated by all three measures (all: P = NS). Training on both models significantly improved performance on all measures (all: P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was strong (checklist: r = 0.90; global rating scale: r = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a simple inexpensive model achieved the same effect on objectively rated skill acquisition as did an expensive simulator. The skills acquired on both models transferred effectively to cadavers. Training for this life-saving skill does not need to be limited by simulator accessibility or cost.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. R. Soulsby and G. Kessell Teaching Lifesaving Procedures: The Impact of Model Fidelity on Acquisition and Transfer of Cricothyrotomy Skills to Performance on Cadavers Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2009; 108(6): 1992 - 1992. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Friedman, K. E. You-Ten, M. D. Bould, and V. Naik Teaching Lifesaving Procedures: The Impact of Model Fidelity on Acquisition and Transfer of Cricothyrotomy Skills to Performance on Cadavers Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2009; 108(6): 1992 - 1993. [Full Text] [PDF]