JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1871-1874
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181887fcc
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohtani, N.
Right arrow Articles by Masaki, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohtani, N.
Right arrow Articles by Masaki, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Pharmacology
Right arrow Pharmacology


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Recovery Profiles from Dexmedetomidine as a General Anesthetic Adjuvant in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery

Norimasa Ohtani, MD*, Kotaro Kida, MD{dagger}, Kazuhiro Shoji, MD{dagger}, Yutaka Yasui, MD{dagger}, and Eiji Masaki, MD, PhD*

From the Departments of Anesthesiology, *Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai; and {dagger}Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Eiji Masaki, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan. Address e-mail to ejmasaki{at}mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine induces less change in hemodynamic values during the extubation period. This drug may be useful in anesthetic management requiring smooth emergence from anesthesia. We sought to determine the effects of co-administration of dexmedetomidine on the recovery profiles from sevoflurane and propofol, which usually provide safe and rapid recovery when administered alone.

METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were randomly divided into four groups according to the anesthetic to be administered; namely, sevoflurane (group S), propofol (group P), both sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine (group SD), or propofol and dexmedetomidine (group PD) as maintenance general anesthetics. After induction, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (0.6%–1.5%) in group S, propofol (2–5 mg/kg/h) in group P, sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg over 10 min followed by 0.4 µg/kg/h until the end of surgery) in group SD, and propofol and dexmedetomidine in group PD with continuous epidural infusion. Bispectral Index values were maintained within 45 ± 5 by changing the concentration of sevoflurane or the infusion rate of propofol in all groups. The time between the interruption of maintenance general anesthetics and eye opening was measured. Postoperative cognitive function was evaluated using the Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test.

RESULTS: The time to eye opening of groups S (8.5 ± 2.5 min, mean ± sd; n = 15) and SD (12.0 ± 3.3 min) were comparable, whereas that of group PD (21.7 ± 7.1 min) was longer than that of group P (11.0 ± 4.4 min). The time to eye opening of group PD was significantly (P < 0.001) longer than those of the other three groups. The scores of Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test between groups S and P were similar and were not changed by co-administration of dexmedetomidine.

CONCLUSION: When co-administered with dexmedetomidine, sevoflurane produced a shorter time to eye opening than propofol. Postoperative cognitive function was not affected by dexmedetomidine administration. These results suggest dexmedetomidine may delay recovery when given as an adjuvant to propofol during total IV anesthesia.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.